Heterogeneity of Fecal Calprotectin Reflecting Generation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in the Gut: New Immunoassays Are Available

Background: We aimed at obtaining more information on the structure of fecal calprotectin (CP) as a basis for establishing improved quantitative assays and detection of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in stools. Commercial fecal CP assays produce different results, probably due to differences in antibodies, extraction procedures, and standards used. In addition, the structure of fecal CP may be different from that in the standard so that rules for immunoassays are violated. We aimed at solving these problems by studying the structure of fecal CP and developing new antibodies and assay procedures including some for NETs in stools. Methods and Findings: Stool samples from children with abdominal symptoms were extracted by a conventional and a new procedure. Some extracts were run on anion exchange and size exclusion chromatography, and fractions were tested on ELISAs by use of ten new mouse monoclonal antibodies against the CP subunit S100A9. Hybrid ELISAs (named HELISA) were established using anti-DNA or anti-histones for coating of microwells, and enzyme labelled anti-CP was used for development. By ion exchange chromatography, five to ten fecal CP subfraction peaks differing in net electric charge were found, all of which contained the major chromatin components. The presence of DNA and histones followed calprotectin in the chromatographic fractions suggesting that NETs are generated in the gut lumen. The new CP monoclonals reacted very differently against the subfractions so that a mixture of them (called MiMo) must be used to obtain reliable assay values for fecal CP. A new method called FELISA was developed where standards and samples are applied directly in Nunc (Denmark) MaxiSorp plates, without any catching antibody. It takes advantage of the property of CP to bind strongly to the plastic in wells. This method has a higher sensitivity because it will detect CP molecules with only one antigenic epitope available. It will give more reliable estimates and more efficient selection of patients for complex diagnostic procedures. We also developed an alternative to the FELISA: a competitive ELISA where S100A9 coated in microwells will compete with CP in standards and samples for binding to a properly diluted HRP-anti-CP solution. In this method, the presence of other proteins in extraction or dilution buffers will not interfere. Using the HELISA, about 65% of the patients had detectable fecal NETs in concentrations between 150 and 1500 ng/mL; however, the values correlated poorly with CP values. Extraction of fecal samples with a simple buffer of TBS, and pH 5 with 5 mM EDTA, gave a yield of about 90%, while the yields of commercial kits are not specified or lie around 50%. A fecal CP standard will bring methods in accordance with the requirements for immunoassays that the structure of CP in the standard and sample must be the same. A mixture of fecal anion exchange fractions as a standard may be a solution to this problem. The principle worked in the first trial by giving the same values after storage of such a standard at 5C for four months. Conclusions: Fecal CP consists of at least five subfractions containing NETs or degradation products thereof. Commercial kits should not be accepted for clinical use unless it has been shown that they can detect all subfractions which may require the use of a mixture of monoclonals. The methods presented here can be used for such a quality control. The HELISA methods can be used for assays on NETs in stools and to study their possible pathogenic effects in the gut. Use of the FELISA and the S100A9 competitive method may give increased sensitivity, higher precision, and better selection of patients for more complex procedures.