互惠的发展援助:对帝国主义和全球殖民政治的回应

Macleans A. Geo‐Jaja, S. Majhanovich
{"title":"互惠的发展援助:对帝国主义和全球殖民政治的回应","authors":"Macleans A. Geo‐Jaja, S. Majhanovich","doi":"10.7459/pc/24.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This position paper seeks to identify the undermining of freedom and human rights, juxtaposed through the narrative of “so much ill and so little good” (Easterly, 2006) regarding traditional aid and cooperation. The hardships currently constructed by linear frameworks leave\n no space for countries to define their own developmental pathway. The inherent ideology of current constructs neglects local initiatives and freedom of action and needs to endorse humanistic dialogue or a shift in approach, rather than a radical change of content. This paper proposes a hybridised\n approach as a means to “restoring culture” in development for Development Aid with Reciprocity ‐the deepening of human rights in every sphere of development and increasing the voice of people. It is contended that development aid for reciprocity in direct relation to the\n benefit of assistance to the countries in question would provide a most positive approach to development.","PeriodicalId":149131,"journal":{"name":"Political Crossroads","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development Aid with Reciprocity: A Response to Imperialism and the Politics of Global Coloniality\",\"authors\":\"Macleans A. Geo‐Jaja, S. Majhanovich\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/pc/24.2.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This position paper seeks to identify the undermining of freedom and human rights, juxtaposed through the narrative of “so much ill and so little good” (Easterly, 2006) regarding traditional aid and cooperation. The hardships currently constructed by linear frameworks leave\\n no space for countries to define their own developmental pathway. The inherent ideology of current constructs neglects local initiatives and freedom of action and needs to endorse humanistic dialogue or a shift in approach, rather than a radical change of content. This paper proposes a hybridised\\n approach as a means to “restoring culture” in development for Development Aid with Reciprocity ‐the deepening of human rights in every sphere of development and increasing the voice of people. It is contended that development aid for reciprocity in direct relation to the\\n benefit of assistance to the countries in question would provide a most positive approach to development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Crossroads\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Crossroads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/pc/24.2.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Crossroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/pc/24.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这份立场文件试图通过传统援助和合作的“如此多的弊端和如此少的好处”(伊斯特利,2006)的叙述来确定自由和人权的破坏。目前线性框架所造成的困难,使各国没有空间确定自己的发展道路。当前建构的内在意识形态忽视了地方主动性和行动自由,需要支持人文对话或方法的转变,而不是内容的根本改变。本文提出了一种混合的方法,作为一种“恢复文化”的手段,以互惠的方式发展援助——在发展的每个领域深化人权,增加人民的声音。有人认为,互惠的发展援助与向有关国家提供援助的利益直接相关,这将是一种最积极的发展办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development Aid with Reciprocity: A Response to Imperialism and the Politics of Global Coloniality
This position paper seeks to identify the undermining of freedom and human rights, juxtaposed through the narrative of “so much ill and so little good” (Easterly, 2006) regarding traditional aid and cooperation. The hardships currently constructed by linear frameworks leave no space for countries to define their own developmental pathway. The inherent ideology of current constructs neglects local initiatives and freedom of action and needs to endorse humanistic dialogue or a shift in approach, rather than a radical change of content. This paper proposes a hybridised approach as a means to “restoring culture” in development for Development Aid with Reciprocity ‐the deepening of human rights in every sphere of development and increasing the voice of people. It is contended that development aid for reciprocity in direct relation to the benefit of assistance to the countries in question would provide a most positive approach to development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信