英国煤粉燃烧的未来

C. H. Sparks
{"title":"英国煤粉燃烧的未来","authors":"C. H. Sparks","doi":"10.1049/JI-2.1947.0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success attained in the burning of semi-bituminous and bituminous fuels has established pulverized-fuel firing in dry-ash bottom furnaces as the preferred method of combustion for power stations in Great Britain. The tendency to divert a high proportion of the poorest quality coal to these new power stations should be viewed with alarm. Owing to the variable quality of ash and the limitations imposed by the presence of this refuse in increasing quantity, boiler units must be moderately rated to maintain satisfactory availability. Combustion rates must be controlled to obviate slagging and birdnesting with the most unfavourable fuel, and this involves the provision of comparatively large furnaces for the duty. For boiler units much in excess of 400 000 lb/h a strong case can be established for using specially-selected fuel, or, alternatively, liquid ash-removal may be employed. In either case, the fine dust from the arresters must be disposed of, and this frequently proves both difficult and expensive. With a view to solving this serious problem, as well as offsetting the disadvantages of variable ash characteristics, the cyclone furnace has been evolved and is at present undergoing trials in the United States, whilst overfeed firing with moving grates has already been developed there for application to boiler units of suitable size for power-station work. Some considerable increase in the output of dust fuel appears probable as the result of increased mechanization in the mines, so that in these circumstances pulverized-coal-fired boilers will always be in demand to dispose of this, unless it is eventually found more profitable to upgrade it for other processes.","PeriodicalId":307627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1947-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The future of pulverized-coal firing in Great Britain\",\"authors\":\"C. H. Sparks\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/JI-2.1947.0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The success attained in the burning of semi-bituminous and bituminous fuels has established pulverized-fuel firing in dry-ash bottom furnaces as the preferred method of combustion for power stations in Great Britain. The tendency to divert a high proportion of the poorest quality coal to these new power stations should be viewed with alarm. Owing to the variable quality of ash and the limitations imposed by the presence of this refuse in increasing quantity, boiler units must be moderately rated to maintain satisfactory availability. Combustion rates must be controlled to obviate slagging and birdnesting with the most unfavourable fuel, and this involves the provision of comparatively large furnaces for the duty. For boiler units much in excess of 400 000 lb/h a strong case can be established for using specially-selected fuel, or, alternatively, liquid ash-removal may be employed. In either case, the fine dust from the arresters must be disposed of, and this frequently proves both difficult and expensive. With a view to solving this serious problem, as well as offsetting the disadvantages of variable ash characteristics, the cyclone furnace has been evolved and is at present undergoing trials in the United States, whilst overfeed firing with moving grates has already been developed there for application to boiler units of suitable size for power-station work. Some considerable increase in the output of dust fuel appears probable as the result of increased mechanization in the mines, so that in these circumstances pulverized-coal-fired boilers will always be in demand to dispose of this, unless it is eventually found more profitable to upgrade it for other processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1947-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/JI-2.1947.0118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/JI-2.1947.0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在燃烧半沥青和沥青燃料方面取得的成功使干灰底炉中的粉末燃料燃烧成为英国发电厂的首选燃烧方法。将大量质量最差的煤炭转移到这些新电厂的趋势应该引起警惕。由于灰分质量的变化和灰分数量的增加所带来的限制,锅炉机组的额定必须适中,以保持令人满意的可用性。必须控制燃烧速度,以避免最不利的燃料结渣和筑巢,这涉及到为任务提供相对较大的炉子。对于远远超过400000磅/小时的锅炉机组,可以建立一个强有力的案例,使用特殊选择的燃料,或者,替代的,可以采用液体除灰。在任何一种情况下,必须处理来自避雷器的细粉尘,而这通常既困难又昂贵。为了解决这一严重问题,并弥补灰特性可变的缺点,旋风炉已经得到发展,目前正在美国进行试验,而在那里已经开发了带移动格栅的过给料燃烧,用于适用于电站工作的适当尺寸的锅炉机组。由于矿山机械化程度的提高,粉尘燃料的产量可能会有相当大的增加,因此在这种情况下,除非最终发现将其升级为其他方法更有利可图,否则总是需要煤粉锅炉来处理这些燃料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The future of pulverized-coal firing in Great Britain
The success attained in the burning of semi-bituminous and bituminous fuels has established pulverized-fuel firing in dry-ash bottom furnaces as the preferred method of combustion for power stations in Great Britain. The tendency to divert a high proportion of the poorest quality coal to these new power stations should be viewed with alarm. Owing to the variable quality of ash and the limitations imposed by the presence of this refuse in increasing quantity, boiler units must be moderately rated to maintain satisfactory availability. Combustion rates must be controlled to obviate slagging and birdnesting with the most unfavourable fuel, and this involves the provision of comparatively large furnaces for the duty. For boiler units much in excess of 400 000 lb/h a strong case can be established for using specially-selected fuel, or, alternatively, liquid ash-removal may be employed. In either case, the fine dust from the arresters must be disposed of, and this frequently proves both difficult and expensive. With a view to solving this serious problem, as well as offsetting the disadvantages of variable ash characteristics, the cyclone furnace has been evolved and is at present undergoing trials in the United States, whilst overfeed firing with moving grates has already been developed there for application to boiler units of suitable size for power-station work. Some considerable increase in the output of dust fuel appears probable as the result of increased mechanization in the mines, so that in these circumstances pulverized-coal-fired boilers will always be in demand to dispose of this, unless it is eventually found more profitable to upgrade it for other processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信