治疗药物监测在未控制的动脉高血压:研究的试点部分的结果

S. Seleznev, S. S. Yаkushin, P. Mylnikov, Yu. S. Tranova, A. V. Shchul’kin, E. Yakusheva, N. N. Nikulina
{"title":"治疗药物监测在未控制的动脉高血压:研究的试点部分的结果","authors":"S. Seleznev, S. S. Yаkushin, P. Mylnikov, Yu. S. Tranova, A. V. Shchul’kin, E. Yakusheva, N. N. Nikulina","doi":"10.17816/pavlovj119880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Despite the recently established evidence-based and systemic approach to treatment for arterial hypertension (AH), not in all cases its control can be achieved. \nAIM: To conduct a comparative analysis of the concentration of antihypertensive drugs (AHTDs) in blood serum of patients with controlled and uncontrolled AH. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty six patients were included. Inclusion criteria: age 18 years, signing of informed consent, established diagnosis of AH, regular intake of any two of study antihypertensive drugs (lisinopril, amlodipine, valsartan) and also of indapamide at stable doses, for women adequate contraception. According to the results of daily monitoring of the arterial pressure (AP), patients were divided into two groups: the first group controlled hypertension (AP 140/90 mmHg; n = 39), the second uncontrolled hypertension (AP 140/90 mmHg; n = 17). The mean age of patients in the first group was 65.03 10.80 years, in the second 63.50 8.31 (p = 0.576). In the first group, women prevailed (64.1% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.047) and the mean body mass index was lower (26.30 1.38 kg/m2 vs. 32.20 4.15 kg/m2, p = 0.02). In patients of both groups, venous blood was taken in fasting condition in the morning and 2 hours after intake of AHTDs to assess their concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography. The analytical range for lisinopril, indapamide, amlodipine was 5500 ng/ml, for valsartan 1010,000 ng/ml. \nRESULTS: In the first group, equilibrium concentration of lisinopril was 2.67 times higher (p = 0.053), and concentration of indapamide in 2 hours after intake was 1.83 times higher (р = 0,084); when normalized to the dose, the differences were leveled out (p 0.05). Concentrations of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ between the groups both before and 2 hours after intake (p 0.05). In 3 of 39 (7.7%) patients with controlled hypertension and in one of 17 patients (5.9%, p = 1.0) with uncontrolled hypertension, AHTDs were detected in blood serum, which were not administered to them. \nCONCLUSIONS: Results of the pilot part of the study (n = 56) demonstrated the absence of difference between the mean concentrations of the study AHTDs in the blood serum of patients with controlled and uncontrolled AH, and in some cases the presence of traces of AHTDs not administered by the doctor.","PeriodicalId":113364,"journal":{"name":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension: Result of the Pilot Part of Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Seleznev, S. S. Yаkushin, P. Mylnikov, Yu. S. Tranova, A. V. Shchul’kin, E. Yakusheva, N. N. Nikulina\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/pavlovj119880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Despite the recently established evidence-based and systemic approach to treatment for arterial hypertension (AH), not in all cases its control can be achieved. \\nAIM: To conduct a comparative analysis of the concentration of antihypertensive drugs (AHTDs) in blood serum of patients with controlled and uncontrolled AH. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty six patients were included. Inclusion criteria: age 18 years, signing of informed consent, established diagnosis of AH, regular intake of any two of study antihypertensive drugs (lisinopril, amlodipine, valsartan) and also of indapamide at stable doses, for women adequate contraception. According to the results of daily monitoring of the arterial pressure (AP), patients were divided into two groups: the first group controlled hypertension (AP 140/90 mmHg; n = 39), the second uncontrolled hypertension (AP 140/90 mmHg; n = 17). The mean age of patients in the first group was 65.03 10.80 years, in the second 63.50 8.31 (p = 0.576). In the first group, women prevailed (64.1% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.047) and the mean body mass index was lower (26.30 1.38 kg/m2 vs. 32.20 4.15 kg/m2, p = 0.02). In patients of both groups, venous blood was taken in fasting condition in the morning and 2 hours after intake of AHTDs to assess their concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography. The analytical range for lisinopril, indapamide, amlodipine was 5500 ng/ml, for valsartan 1010,000 ng/ml. \\nRESULTS: In the first group, equilibrium concentration of lisinopril was 2.67 times higher (p = 0.053), and concentration of indapamide in 2 hours after intake was 1.83 times higher (р = 0,084); when normalized to the dose, the differences were leveled out (p 0.05). Concentrations of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ between the groups both before and 2 hours after intake (p 0.05). In 3 of 39 (7.7%) patients with controlled hypertension and in one of 17 patients (5.9%, p = 1.0) with uncontrolled hypertension, AHTDs were detected in blood serum, which were not administered to them. \\nCONCLUSIONS: Results of the pilot part of the study (n = 56) demonstrated the absence of difference between the mean concentrations of the study AHTDs in the blood serum of patients with controlled and uncontrolled AH, and in some cases the presence of traces of AHTDs not administered by the doctor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj119880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj119880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:尽管最近建立了以证据为基础的系统方法来治疗动脉高血压(AH),但并非所有病例都能得到控制。目的:比较分析控制型和不控制型AH患者血清中抗高血压药物(AHTDs)的浓度。材料与方法:纳入56例患者。纳入标准:年龄18岁,签署知情同意书,确诊为AH,定期服用任何两种抗高血压药物(赖诺普利、氨氯地平、缬沙坦)和稳定剂量的吲达帕胺,女性有充分的避孕措施。根据每日动脉压(AP)监测结果将患者分为两组:第一组控制高血压(AP 140/90 mmHg;n = 39),第二例未控制高血压(AP 140/90 mmHg;N = 17)。第一组患者平均年龄65.03 - 10.80岁,第二组患者平均年龄63.50 - 8.31岁(p = 0.576)。第一组以女性为主(64.1%比35.3%,p = 0.047),平均体重指数较低(26.30 1.38 kg/m2比32.20 4.15 kg/m2, p = 0.02)。两组患者均在空腹的情况下于早晨和服用AHTDs后2小时取静脉血,采用高效液相色谱法测定其浓度。赖诺普利、吲达帕胺、氨氯地平的分析范围为5500 ng/ml,缬沙坦的分析范围为1010 000 ng/ml。结果:第一组患者赖诺普利的平衡浓度比对照组高2.67倍(p = 0.053),吲达帕胺的平衡浓度比对照组高1.83倍(p = 0.084);当与剂量归一化时,差异被消除(p 0.05)。氨氯地平和缬沙坦的浓度在两组患者服药前和服药后2小时均无差异(p < 0.05)。39例高血压控制患者中有3例(7.7%)和17例高血压不控制患者中有1例(5.9%,p = 1.0)血清中检测到AHTDs,但未给药。结论:该研究的试点部分(n = 56)的结果表明,控制和不控制AH患者血清中研究AHTDs的平均浓度之间没有差异,并且在某些情况下存在非医生给药的AHTDs的痕迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension: Result of the Pilot Part of Study
INTRODUCTION: Despite the recently established evidence-based and systemic approach to treatment for arterial hypertension (AH), not in all cases its control can be achieved. AIM: To conduct a comparative analysis of the concentration of antihypertensive drugs (AHTDs) in blood serum of patients with controlled and uncontrolled AH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty six patients were included. Inclusion criteria: age 18 years, signing of informed consent, established diagnosis of AH, regular intake of any two of study antihypertensive drugs (lisinopril, amlodipine, valsartan) and also of indapamide at stable doses, for women adequate contraception. According to the results of daily monitoring of the arterial pressure (AP), patients were divided into two groups: the first group controlled hypertension (AP 140/90 mmHg; n = 39), the second uncontrolled hypertension (AP 140/90 mmHg; n = 17). The mean age of patients in the first group was 65.03 10.80 years, in the second 63.50 8.31 (p = 0.576). In the first group, women prevailed (64.1% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.047) and the mean body mass index was lower (26.30 1.38 kg/m2 vs. 32.20 4.15 kg/m2, p = 0.02). In patients of both groups, venous blood was taken in fasting condition in the morning and 2 hours after intake of AHTDs to assess their concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography. The analytical range for lisinopril, indapamide, amlodipine was 5500 ng/ml, for valsartan 1010,000 ng/ml. RESULTS: In the first group, equilibrium concentration of lisinopril was 2.67 times higher (p = 0.053), and concentration of indapamide in 2 hours after intake was 1.83 times higher (р = 0,084); when normalized to the dose, the differences were leveled out (p 0.05). Concentrations of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ between the groups both before and 2 hours after intake (p 0.05). In 3 of 39 (7.7%) patients with controlled hypertension and in one of 17 patients (5.9%, p = 1.0) with uncontrolled hypertension, AHTDs were detected in blood serum, which were not administered to them. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the pilot part of the study (n = 56) demonstrated the absence of difference between the mean concentrations of the study AHTDs in the blood serum of patients with controlled and uncontrolled AH, and in some cases the presence of traces of AHTDs not administered by the doctor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信