基于SEPIC和Cuk转换器的PFC PID和FOPID控制器

A. Mishra, P. K. Nanda, Debiprasanna Das, A. Patra, Narayan Nahak, Lalit M. Sathapathy
{"title":"基于SEPIC和Cuk转换器的PFC PID和FOPID控制器","authors":"A. Mishra, P. K. Nanda, Debiprasanna Das, A. Patra, Narayan Nahak, Lalit M. Sathapathy","doi":"10.1109/APSIT58554.2023.10201788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comparative performance analysis of two power factor correction (PFC) converter topology, namely the Cuk and SEPIC converter. The Hysteresis Current Control (HCC) approach is engaged in the input of the PFC. However, for controlling the output voltage, methods like Fractional Order Proportional Integral and Derivative Controller (FOPIDC) or Conventional Proportional Integral Derivative Controller (PIDC) is used. The analysis of both the converters is performed using MATLAB/Simulink tool and the proposed topologies are surveyed under steady state and dynamic state conditions.","PeriodicalId":170044,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PID and FOPID Controller Based SEPIC and Cuk Converter for PFC\",\"authors\":\"A. Mishra, P. K. Nanda, Debiprasanna Das, A. Patra, Narayan Nahak, Lalit M. Sathapathy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSIT58554.2023.10201788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a comparative performance analysis of two power factor correction (PFC) converter topology, namely the Cuk and SEPIC converter. The Hysteresis Current Control (HCC) approach is engaged in the input of the PFC. However, for controlling the output voltage, methods like Fractional Order Proportional Integral and Derivative Controller (FOPIDC) or Conventional Proportional Integral Derivative Controller (PIDC) is used. The analysis of both the converters is performed using MATLAB/Simulink tool and the proposed topologies are surveyed under steady state and dynamic state conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT58554.2023.10201788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT58554.2023.10201788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对两种功率因数校正(PFC)转换器拓扑,即Cuk和SEPIC转换器进行了性能比较分析。迟滞电流控制(HCC)方法用于pfc的输入,而对于输出电压的控制,则使用分数阶比例积分导数控制器(FOPIDC)或传统比例积分导数控制器(PIDC)等方法。利用MATLAB/Simulink工具对两种变换器进行了分析,并在稳态和动态条件下对所提出的拓扑结构进行了考察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PID and FOPID Controller Based SEPIC and Cuk Converter for PFC
This paper provides a comparative performance analysis of two power factor correction (PFC) converter topology, namely the Cuk and SEPIC converter. The Hysteresis Current Control (HCC) approach is engaged in the input of the PFC. However, for controlling the output voltage, methods like Fractional Order Proportional Integral and Derivative Controller (FOPIDC) or Conventional Proportional Integral Derivative Controller (PIDC) is used. The analysis of both the converters is performed using MATLAB/Simulink tool and the proposed topologies are surveyed under steady state and dynamic state conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信