集体住房的集体谈判:Hilberseimer, Goldberg和工会对新的生活类型学的斗争

In Commons Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35483/acsa.am.111.36
Alexander Eisenschmidt
{"title":"集体住房的集体谈判:Hilberseimer, Goldberg和工会对新的生活类型学的斗争","authors":"Alexander Eisenschmidt","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the World Bank, 1.6 billion people will be affected by the shortage in housing by 2025 and the United Nations estimates that today 100 million people are without a home—records that are driven by the lack of affordable housing and an exponential rise of housing cost over income. Acknowledging the difficulties to escape today’s neoliberal market value begs the question of alternatives to profit- based home ownership and the possibility of a radical rethinking of housing. This essay, therefore, investigates two projects that challenged the economic system in place and rethought housing by rewriting its dominant narratives, financial frameworks, and spatial layouts. In vastly different contexts Ludwig Hilberseimer’s 1923 project of the Wohnstadt (residential city) and Bertrand Goldberg’s 1960s Marina City in Chicago allied with unions in their struggle for a new kind of housing. In both cases, the partnership between architecture and labor organization pushed the project far beyond spatial and programmatic ambitions. These collaborations point at a model in which a union’s knowledge in collective bargaining became instrumental in the creation of housing through an alliance with architecture.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Bargaining for Collective Housing: Hilberseimer, Goldberg, and the Labor Union’s Struggle Towards New Typologies of Living\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Eisenschmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.am.111.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the World Bank, 1.6 billion people will be affected by the shortage in housing by 2025 and the United Nations estimates that today 100 million people are without a home—records that are driven by the lack of affordable housing and an exponential rise of housing cost over income. Acknowledging the difficulties to escape today’s neoliberal market value begs the question of alternatives to profit- based home ownership and the possibility of a radical rethinking of housing. This essay, therefore, investigates two projects that challenged the economic system in place and rethought housing by rewriting its dominant narratives, financial frameworks, and spatial layouts. In vastly different contexts Ludwig Hilberseimer’s 1923 project of the Wohnstadt (residential city) and Bertrand Goldberg’s 1960s Marina City in Chicago allied with unions in their struggle for a new kind of housing. In both cases, the partnership between architecture and labor organization pushed the project far beyond spatial and programmatic ambitions. These collaborations point at a model in which a union’s knowledge in collective bargaining became instrumental in the creation of housing through an alliance with architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Commons\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据世界银行的数据,到2025年,16亿人将受到住房短缺的影响,联合国估计,今天有1亿人无家可归——这是由于缺乏负担得起的住房和住房成本超过收入的指数级增长造成的。承认摆脱今天的新自由主义市场价值的困难,回避了以利润为基础的房屋所有权的替代问题,以及对住房进行彻底反思的可能性。因此,本文研究了两个挑战现有经济体系的项目,并通过重写其主导叙事、金融框架和空间布局来重新思考住房。Ludwig Hilberseimer在1923年的Wohnstadt(住宅城市)项目和Bertrand Goldberg在1960年代在芝加哥的Marina city项目在截然不同的背景下与工会结盟,为一种新型住房而斗争。在这两种情况下,建筑和劳工组织之间的合作关系使项目远远超出了空间和功能的野心。这些合作表明了一种模式,在这种模式中,工会在集体谈判中的知识通过与建筑的联盟成为创造住房的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective Bargaining for Collective Housing: Hilberseimer, Goldberg, and the Labor Union’s Struggle Towards New Typologies of Living
According to the World Bank, 1.6 billion people will be affected by the shortage in housing by 2025 and the United Nations estimates that today 100 million people are without a home—records that are driven by the lack of affordable housing and an exponential rise of housing cost over income. Acknowledging the difficulties to escape today’s neoliberal market value begs the question of alternatives to profit- based home ownership and the possibility of a radical rethinking of housing. This essay, therefore, investigates two projects that challenged the economic system in place and rethought housing by rewriting its dominant narratives, financial frameworks, and spatial layouts. In vastly different contexts Ludwig Hilberseimer’s 1923 project of the Wohnstadt (residential city) and Bertrand Goldberg’s 1960s Marina City in Chicago allied with unions in their struggle for a new kind of housing. In both cases, the partnership between architecture and labor organization pushed the project far beyond spatial and programmatic ambitions. These collaborations point at a model in which a union’s knowledge in collective bargaining became instrumental in the creation of housing through an alliance with architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信