G. Nicolosi
{"title":"Communication, fear and collective trauma in first wave COVID-19 “double epidemic” in Italy: traces and clues","authors":"G. Nicolosi","doi":"10.53701/SHJ.V1I1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Coronavirus epidemic has demonstrated just how unprepared our societies were for an occurrence of this kind. On March 2020, the Italian government was in fact the first in Europe to implement a strategy of lockdown on the whole national territory, not just in the areas where outbreaks occurred.  The coronavirus crisis was concentrated in a specific area: in particular, the region of Lombardy and some isolated provinces in the north of Italy. So Italy has suffered a “double” epidemic, but the strategy adopted was uniform and radical. This contribution does not focus on the effectiveness of the Italian strategy per sè. The aim is rather to analyse the Italian Case from the point of view of media and institutional communications with the intention of bringing to light some critical issues. In particular, here it is posited that emergency communication produced during the “first wave” of pandemic has significantly contributed to fostering a climate of anxiety and collective fear with possible traumatogenic consequences. Within an emergency context, communication can be the thin boundary line between collective trauma and resilience and covid 19 pandemic was also a public communication crisis. This essay tries to analyse some traumatogenetic issues of institutional and media communication during the coronavirus crisis in Italy. Below a non-exhaustive list of these issues: A dramatic center-periphery coordination deficit; Wavering institutional communication; The “numerological” hegemony\"; The absence of an “exit strategy”.","PeriodicalId":223555,"journal":{"name":"Studia Humanitatis Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Humanitatis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53701/SHJ.V1I1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状病毒的流行表明,我们的社会对这种情况的发生是多么的措手不及。2020年3月,意大利政府实际上是欧洲第一个在全国范围内实施封锁战略的国家,而不仅仅是在发生疫情的地区。冠状病毒危机集中在一个特定地区:特别是伦巴第地区和意大利北部的一些孤立省份。因此,意大利遭受了“双重”流行病,但采取的策略是统一而激进的。这项贡献并不侧重于意大利sè战略的有效性。其目的是从媒体和机构传播的角度分析意大利的案例,以期揭示一些关键问题。特别是,有人认为,在流行病"第一波"期间产生的紧急通信大大助长了焦虑和集体恐惧的气氛,可能造成创伤性后果。在紧急情况下,沟通可能是集体创伤和复原力之间的细微界限,covid - 19大流行也是一场公共沟通危机。本文试图分析意大利冠状病毒危机期间机构和媒体传播的一些创伤遗传学问题。以下是这些问题的非详尽清单:中心与外围的协调严重不足;机构沟通摇摆不定;“命理学霸权”;缺乏“退出战略”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication, fear and collective trauma in first wave COVID-19 “double epidemic” in Italy: traces and clues
The Coronavirus epidemic has demonstrated just how unprepared our societies were for an occurrence of this kind. On March 2020, the Italian government was in fact the first in Europe to implement a strategy of lockdown on the whole national territory, not just in the areas where outbreaks occurred.  The coronavirus crisis was concentrated in a specific area: in particular, the region of Lombardy and some isolated provinces in the north of Italy. So Italy has suffered a “double” epidemic, but the strategy adopted was uniform and radical. This contribution does not focus on the effectiveness of the Italian strategy per sè. The aim is rather to analyse the Italian Case from the point of view of media and institutional communications with the intention of bringing to light some critical issues. In particular, here it is posited that emergency communication produced during the “first wave” of pandemic has significantly contributed to fostering a climate of anxiety and collective fear with possible traumatogenic consequences. Within an emergency context, communication can be the thin boundary line between collective trauma and resilience and covid 19 pandemic was also a public communication crisis. This essay tries to analyse some traumatogenetic issues of institutional and media communication during the coronavirus crisis in Italy. Below a non-exhaustive list of these issues: A dramatic center-periphery coordination deficit; Wavering institutional communication; The “numerological” hegemony"; The absence of an “exit strategy”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信