责任、权利和不确定性

A. Grandori
{"title":"责任、权利和不确定性","authors":"A. Grandori","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3756991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating law, economics and organization theory, the paper argues that important aspects of social responsibility (SR), figure among the raisons d’etre of the firm as an institution of modern economic and juridical systems. Furthermore, a nexus between SR and the uncertainty of consequences of economic action is established, shedding new light on some of the current debates in corporate governance. Specifically, it leads to the proposition that a ‘substantive’ approach to SR (what a firm’s objectives should be) is less flexible and less fit to uncertainty than a ‘procedural’ approach to SR (who and how is entitled to decide); and that a notion of ‘rightholding’ is more adequate than the usual notion of ‘stakeholding’ for a proper design of governance structures. The argument is supported by analyses of recent real cases.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsibility, Rightholding and Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"A. Grandori\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3756991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Integrating law, economics and organization theory, the paper argues that important aspects of social responsibility (SR), figure among the raisons d’etre of the firm as an institution of modern economic and juridical systems. Furthermore, a nexus between SR and the uncertainty of consequences of economic action is established, shedding new light on some of the current debates in corporate governance. Specifically, it leads to the proposition that a ‘substantive’ approach to SR (what a firm’s objectives should be) is less flexible and less fit to uncertainty than a ‘procedural’ approach to SR (who and how is entitled to decide); and that a notion of ‘rightholding’ is more adequate than the usual notion of ‘stakeholding’ for a proper design of governance structures. The argument is supported by analyses of recent real cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文综合了法律、经济学和组织理论,认为社会责任的重要方面是企业作为现代经济和司法制度机构存在的理由之一。此外,建立了社会责任与经济行为后果的不确定性之间的联系,为当前公司治理中的一些争论提供了新的思路。具体来说,它导致了这样一个命题,即“实质性”的社会责任方法(公司的目标应该是什么)比“程序性”的社会责任方法(谁以及如何决定)更不灵活,更不适合不确定性;对于治理结构的适当设计,“权利持有”的概念比通常的“利益相关者”的概念更充分。对最近真实案例的分析支持了这一论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsibility, Rightholding and Uncertainty
Integrating law, economics and organization theory, the paper argues that important aspects of social responsibility (SR), figure among the raisons d’etre of the firm as an institution of modern economic and juridical systems. Furthermore, a nexus between SR and the uncertainty of consequences of economic action is established, shedding new light on some of the current debates in corporate governance. Specifically, it leads to the proposition that a ‘substantive’ approach to SR (what a firm’s objectives should be) is less flexible and less fit to uncertainty than a ‘procedural’ approach to SR (who and how is entitled to decide); and that a notion of ‘rightholding’ is more adequate than the usual notion of ‘stakeholding’ for a proper design of governance structures. The argument is supported by analyses of recent real cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信