工作、技术和不平等

Kory P. Schaff
{"title":"工作、技术和不平等","authors":"Kory P. Schaff","doi":"10.4324/9780429455902-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent technological innovation in microchip processors, robotics, and artificial intelligence has the potential to create a perfect storm that radically transforms the structure and organization of work. In particular, the rise of “smart” machines on assembly lines, delivery drones, and self-driving vehicles are likely to eliminate many kinds of jobs in the near future. 1 The prospect of such changes raises serious concerns about the impact of technology on human values and what will happen to the welfare of millions of workers whose livelihoods are rendered obsolete. At the same time, democratic welfare states continue to struggle with inequality in many spaces, including education, gender and racial discrimination, unemployment and stagnant wages, poverty, and wealth disparity. These problems have also been intensified by technology and globalization. Despite an unprecedented expansion of access to information and communication the digital revolution has made possible, inequality in developed countries is at record levels, and the gap with developing countries grows wider ( Pikkety 2014 ). Given these developments, a novel proposal that is the subject of debate among both academics and policymakers is now gaining fresh momentum: Provide all citizens with a “basic income” that ensures a social minimum. The strategy of this proposal is to give all qualified individuals an unrestricted cash grant that provides them with all-purpose means that do not depend on status, wealth, or employment. Without restrictions, individuals can choose for themselves how best to utilize the grant. Some of these choices may include reducing work hours, increasing leisure time, investing in financial markets, creating small businesses, or consuming more goods. The creation of this social minimum might also alleviate some of the problems of inequality just described. For example, the automation of workplaces will mean fewer jobs in the future, so the provision of a basic income could be an efficient solution to a rather complex set of problems. Can basic income replace work in the age of automation? More specifically, we want to know whether a basic income scheme can replace the benefits of work in an age where technology has the potential to","PeriodicalId":208140,"journal":{"name":"The Future of Work, Technology, and Basic Income","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work, Technology, and Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Kory P. Schaff\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429455902-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent technological innovation in microchip processors, robotics, and artificial intelligence has the potential to create a perfect storm that radically transforms the structure and organization of work. In particular, the rise of “smart” machines on assembly lines, delivery drones, and self-driving vehicles are likely to eliminate many kinds of jobs in the near future. 1 The prospect of such changes raises serious concerns about the impact of technology on human values and what will happen to the welfare of millions of workers whose livelihoods are rendered obsolete. At the same time, democratic welfare states continue to struggle with inequality in many spaces, including education, gender and racial discrimination, unemployment and stagnant wages, poverty, and wealth disparity. These problems have also been intensified by technology and globalization. Despite an unprecedented expansion of access to information and communication the digital revolution has made possible, inequality in developed countries is at record levels, and the gap with developing countries grows wider ( Pikkety 2014 ). Given these developments, a novel proposal that is the subject of debate among both academics and policymakers is now gaining fresh momentum: Provide all citizens with a “basic income” that ensures a social minimum. The strategy of this proposal is to give all qualified individuals an unrestricted cash grant that provides them with all-purpose means that do not depend on status, wealth, or employment. Without restrictions, individuals can choose for themselves how best to utilize the grant. Some of these choices may include reducing work hours, increasing leisure time, investing in financial markets, creating small businesses, or consuming more goods. The creation of this social minimum might also alleviate some of the problems of inequality just described. For example, the automation of workplaces will mean fewer jobs in the future, so the provision of a basic income could be an efficient solution to a rather complex set of problems. Can basic income replace work in the age of automation? More specifically, we want to know whether a basic income scheme can replace the benefits of work in an age where technology has the potential to\",\"PeriodicalId\":208140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Future of Work, Technology, and Basic Income\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Future of Work, Technology, and Basic Income\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455902-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Future of Work, Technology, and Basic Income","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455902-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在微芯片处理器、机器人和人工智能方面的技术创新有可能创造一场从根本上改变工作结构和组织的完美风暴。特别是,装配线上的“智能”机器、送货无人机和自动驾驶汽车的兴起,可能会在不久的将来取代许多工作岗位。这些变化的前景引起了人们对技术对人类价值观的影响的严重关注,以及对数百万生计变得过时的工人的福利将会发生什么。与此同时,民主福利国家继续在许多领域与不平等作斗争,包括教育、性别和种族歧视、失业和工资停滞、贫困和贫富差距。技术和全球化也加剧了这些问题。尽管数字革命使获取信息和通信的机会空前扩大,但发达国家的不平等处于创纪录的水平,与发展中国家的差距越来越大(Pikkety 2014)。鉴于这些发展,一项一直在学术界和政策制定者之间争论的新提议正在获得新的动力:为所有公民提供确保社会最低水平的“基本收入”。这项提案的策略是给予所有符合条件的个人不受限制的现金补助,为他们提供不依赖于地位、财富或就业的全能手段。不受任何限制,个人可以自行选择如何最好地利用该奖助金。其中一些选择可能包括减少工作时间、增加休闲时间、投资金融市场、创建小企业或消费更多商品。创造这个社会最低限度也可能缓解刚才描述的一些不平等问题。例如,工作场所的自动化将意味着未来工作岗位的减少,因此提供基本收入可能是解决一系列相当复杂问题的有效方法。在自动化时代,基本收入能取代工作吗?更具体地说,我们想知道,在一个技术有可能取代工作的时代,基本收入计划是否能取代工作带来的好处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work, Technology, and Inequality
Recent technological innovation in microchip processors, robotics, and artificial intelligence has the potential to create a perfect storm that radically transforms the structure and organization of work. In particular, the rise of “smart” machines on assembly lines, delivery drones, and self-driving vehicles are likely to eliminate many kinds of jobs in the near future. 1 The prospect of such changes raises serious concerns about the impact of technology on human values and what will happen to the welfare of millions of workers whose livelihoods are rendered obsolete. At the same time, democratic welfare states continue to struggle with inequality in many spaces, including education, gender and racial discrimination, unemployment and stagnant wages, poverty, and wealth disparity. These problems have also been intensified by technology and globalization. Despite an unprecedented expansion of access to information and communication the digital revolution has made possible, inequality in developed countries is at record levels, and the gap with developing countries grows wider ( Pikkety 2014 ). Given these developments, a novel proposal that is the subject of debate among both academics and policymakers is now gaining fresh momentum: Provide all citizens with a “basic income” that ensures a social minimum. The strategy of this proposal is to give all qualified individuals an unrestricted cash grant that provides them with all-purpose means that do not depend on status, wealth, or employment. Without restrictions, individuals can choose for themselves how best to utilize the grant. Some of these choices may include reducing work hours, increasing leisure time, investing in financial markets, creating small businesses, or consuming more goods. The creation of this social minimum might also alleviate some of the problems of inequality just described. For example, the automation of workplaces will mean fewer jobs in the future, so the provision of a basic income could be an efficient solution to a rather complex set of problems. Can basic income replace work in the age of automation? More specifically, we want to know whether a basic income scheme can replace the benefits of work in an age where technology has the potential to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信