来吧，现在，让我们认真对待研究

Gestalt Review Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5325/GESTALTREVIEW.18.1.0006

P. Brownell, MDiv, Psyd

{"title":"来吧，现在，让我们认真对待研究","authors":"P. Brownell, MDiv, Psyd","doi":"10.5325/GESTALTREVIEW.18.1.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article considers a contemporary philosophy of science as a product of naturalism, critical realism, and postpositivism. This contemporary philosophy of science undergirds the selection of methods for ascertaining and developing evidence to support an evidence-based practice. The article provides a description of the steps one might make in constructing one's own evidence-based practice. It also offers a contrast between the views of some prominent Gestalt therapists and the pro-research oriented perspective.","PeriodicalId":444860,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt Review","volume":"96 44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C'mon Now, Let's Get Serious about Research\",\"authors\":\"P. Brownell, MDiv, Psyd\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/GESTALTREVIEW.18.1.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article considers a contemporary philosophy of science as a product of naturalism, critical realism, and postpositivism. This contemporary philosophy of science undergirds the selection of methods for ascertaining and developing evidence to support an evidence-based practice. The article provides a description of the steps one might make in constructing one's own evidence-based practice. It also offers a contrast between the views of some prominent Gestalt therapists and the pro-research oriented perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestalt Review\",\"volume\":\"96 44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestalt Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/GESTALTREVIEW.18.1.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/GESTALTREVIEW.18.1.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文认为当代科学哲学是自然主义、批判现实主义和后实证主义的产物。这种当代科学哲学强化了确定和发展证据的方法选择，以支持循证实践。文章描述了一个人在构建自己的循证实践时可能采取的步骤。它也提供了一些著名的格式塔治疗师的观点和亲研究导向的观点之间的对比。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

C'mon Now, Let's Get Serious about Research

This article considers a contemporary philosophy of science as a product of naturalism, critical realism, and postpositivism. This contemporary philosophy of science undergirds the selection of methods for ascertaining and developing evidence to support an evidence-based practice. The article provides a description of the steps one might make in constructing one's own evidence-based practice. It also offers a contrast between the views of some prominent Gestalt therapists and the pro-research oriented perspective.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gestalt Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量