均匀随机抽样不建议

Jianguo Lu, Hao Wang, Dingding Li
{"title":"均匀随机抽样不建议","authors":"Jianguo Lu, Hao Wang, Dingding Li","doi":"10.1145/3184558.3186240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that uniform random sampling is not as effective as PPS (probability proportional to size) sampling in many estimation tasks. In the setting of (graph) size estimation, this paper demonstrates that random edge sampling outperforms random node sampling, with a performance ratio proportional to the normalized graph degree variance. This result is particularly important in the era of big data, when data are typically large and scale-free, resulting in large degree variance. We derive the result by first giving the variances of random node and random edge estimators. A simpler and more intuitive result is obtained by assuming that the data is large and degree distribution follows a power law.","PeriodicalId":235572,"journal":{"name":"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uniform Random Sampling Not Recommended\",\"authors\":\"Jianguo Lu, Hao Wang, Dingding Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3184558.3186240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that uniform random sampling is not as effective as PPS (probability proportional to size) sampling in many estimation tasks. In the setting of (graph) size estimation, this paper demonstrates that random edge sampling outperforms random node sampling, with a performance ratio proportional to the normalized graph degree variance. This result is particularly important in the era of big data, when data are typically large and scale-free, resulting in large degree variance. We derive the result by first giving the variances of random node and random edge estimators. A simpler and more intuitive result is obtained by assuming that the data is large and degree distribution follows a power law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们证明了均匀随机抽样在许多估计任务中不如PPS(大小概率正比)抽样有效。在(图)大小估计的情况下,本文证明了随机边缘采样优于随机节点采样,其性能比与归一化图度方差成正比。这一结果在大数据时代尤为重要,因为大数据通常是海量且无标度的,因此会产生很大的程度方差。我们首先给出随机节点和随机边估计量的方差来推导结果。假设数据量大,度分布服从幂律,可以得到一个更简单直观的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uniform Random Sampling Not Recommended
We show that uniform random sampling is not as effective as PPS (probability proportional to size) sampling in many estimation tasks. In the setting of (graph) size estimation, this paper demonstrates that random edge sampling outperforms random node sampling, with a performance ratio proportional to the normalized graph degree variance. This result is particularly important in the era of big data, when data are typically large and scale-free, resulting in large degree variance. We derive the result by first giving the variances of random node and random edge estimators. A simpler and more intuitive result is obtained by assuming that the data is large and degree distribution follows a power law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信