使用用户工作负载模拟器对虚拟桌面基础架构主机进行评估

S. Abdullah, M. F. M. Nadzri, Z. H. C. Soh, K. Z. Zamli
{"title":"使用用户工作负载模拟器对虚拟桌面基础架构主机进行评估","authors":"S. Abdullah, M. F. M. Nadzri, Z. H. C. Soh, K. Z. Zamli","doi":"10.1109/ICOS.2015.7377273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing cost and complexity of maintaining physical computers have caused large organization to consider alternative solution such as implementing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) in their enterprise network. However, before deploying VDI solution in a large scale, it is essential to evaluate the sufficiency of the solution first. As a result, User Workload Simulator was developed. The simulator was used to evaluate two VDI solutions that are named VDI A and VDI B. The objective of the evaluation is to compare which solution can be a better VDI server host. From the result, VDI A is sufficiently better than VDI B for VM density per host. But in terms of network bandwidth utilization and Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) consumption per host, VDI B is sufficiently better as it utilized less network bandwidth and consumed less IOPS on most of the user profiles evaluated.","PeriodicalId":422736,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator\",\"authors\":\"S. Abdullah, M. F. M. Nadzri, Z. H. C. Soh, K. Z. Zamli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOS.2015.7377273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasing cost and complexity of maintaining physical computers have caused large organization to consider alternative solution such as implementing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) in their enterprise network. However, before deploying VDI solution in a large scale, it is essential to evaluate the sufficiency of the solution first. As a result, User Workload Simulator was developed. The simulator was used to evaluate two VDI solutions that are named VDI A and VDI B. The objective of the evaluation is to compare which solution can be a better VDI server host. From the result, VDI A is sufficiently better than VDI B for VM density per host. But in terms of network bandwidth utilization and Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) consumption per host, VDI B is sufficiently better as it utilized less network bandwidth and consumed less IOPS on most of the user profiles evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOS.2015.7377273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOS.2015.7377273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

维护物理计算机的成本和复杂性不断增加,导致大型组织考虑在其企业网络中实现虚拟桌面基础设施(VDI)等替代解决方案。然而,在大规模部署VDI解决方案之前,必须首先评估解决方案的充分性。因此,开发了用户工作负载模拟器。该模拟器用于评估名为VDI A和VDI b的两种VDI解决方案,评估的目的是比较哪种解决方案可以成为更好的VDI服务器主机。从结果来看,对于每台主机的虚拟机密度,VDI A远远优于VDI B。但就网络带宽利用率和每台主机的每秒输入/输出操作(IOPS)消耗而言,VDI B的性能要好得多,因为在评估的大多数用户配置文件中,它利用的网络带宽和消耗的IOPS都更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure host using User Workload Simulator
Increasing cost and complexity of maintaining physical computers have caused large organization to consider alternative solution such as implementing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) in their enterprise network. However, before deploying VDI solution in a large scale, it is essential to evaluate the sufficiency of the solution first. As a result, User Workload Simulator was developed. The simulator was used to evaluate two VDI solutions that are named VDI A and VDI B. The objective of the evaluation is to compare which solution can be a better VDI server host. From the result, VDI A is sufficiently better than VDI B for VM density per host. But in terms of network bandwidth utilization and Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) consumption per host, VDI B is sufficiently better as it utilized less network bandwidth and consumed less IOPS on most of the user profiles evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信