单变量人口的分层:分布重要吗?

Reddy K.G., Khan M.G.M.
{"title":"单变量人口的分层:分布重要吗?","authors":"Reddy K.G., Khan M.G.M.","doi":"10.1109/APWCONCSE.2017.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principal reason for stratification in the design of sample surveys is to reduce the variance of sample estimates. Efforts are always made to achieve further improvements in precision of these estimates. Not only does it depend on the sample sizes but also on the heterogeneity of the population units. Stratification in univariate populations has been explored by numerous researchers, many of whom have proposed competing algorithms that help surveyors determine efficient stratum boundaries. This paper takes into consideration the best criterion of using the estimated frequency distribution of the univariate population. To construct the strata boundaries, suitable cut-points are placed on the range of the estimated distribution using the dynamic programming algorithm which leads to globally optimum solutions. This paper investigates if the choice of the estimated distribution leads to different strata boundaries and hence contributes to the efficiency of the results. A numerical example using real data is presented to find answers to the question of whether the choice of distribution does or does not matter.","PeriodicalId":215519,"journal":{"name":"2017 4th Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratification of Univariate Populations: Does Distribution Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Reddy K.G., Khan M.G.M.\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APWCONCSE.2017.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principal reason for stratification in the design of sample surveys is to reduce the variance of sample estimates. Efforts are always made to achieve further improvements in precision of these estimates. Not only does it depend on the sample sizes but also on the heterogeneity of the population units. Stratification in univariate populations has been explored by numerous researchers, many of whom have proposed competing algorithms that help surveyors determine efficient stratum boundaries. This paper takes into consideration the best criterion of using the estimated frequency distribution of the univariate population. To construct the strata boundaries, suitable cut-points are placed on the range of the estimated distribution using the dynamic programming algorithm which leads to globally optimum solutions. This paper investigates if the choice of the estimated distribution leads to different strata boundaries and hence contributes to the efficiency of the results. A numerical example using real data is presented to find answers to the question of whether the choice of distribution does or does not matter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 4th Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 4th Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APWCONCSE.2017.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 4th Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APWCONCSE.2017.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在抽样调查的设计中分层的主要原因是为了减少样本估计的方差。人们总是努力进一步提高这些估计的精度。它不仅取决于样本量,还取决于总体单位的异质性。许多研究人员对单变量人口中的分层进行了探索,其中许多人提出了相互竞争的算法,以帮助测量员确定有效的地层边界。本文考虑了单变量总体估计频率分布的最佳准则。利用动态规划算法在估计分布范围内设置合适的切点,构造地层边界,得到全局最优解。本文探讨了估计分布的选择是否会导致不同的地层边界,从而有助于结果的效率。用一个实际数据的数值例子来回答分布的选择是否有影响的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stratification of Univariate Populations: Does Distribution Matter?
The principal reason for stratification in the design of sample surveys is to reduce the variance of sample estimates. Efforts are always made to achieve further improvements in precision of these estimates. Not only does it depend on the sample sizes but also on the heterogeneity of the population units. Stratification in univariate populations has been explored by numerous researchers, many of whom have proposed competing algorithms that help surveyors determine efficient stratum boundaries. This paper takes into consideration the best criterion of using the estimated frequency distribution of the univariate population. To construct the strata boundaries, suitable cut-points are placed on the range of the estimated distribution using the dynamic programming algorithm which leads to globally optimum solutions. This paper investigates if the choice of the estimated distribution leads to different strata boundaries and hence contributes to the efficiency of the results. A numerical example using real data is presented to find answers to the question of whether the choice of distribution does or does not matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信