经济发展会影响大选结果吗?来自印度各邦消费支出趋势的证据

S. Mukherjee, D. Chakraborty
{"title":"经济发展会影响大选结果吗?来自印度各邦消费支出趋势的证据","authors":"S. Mukherjee, D. Chakraborty","doi":"10.1177/2455133317703206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract India left aside the economic philosophy of the import-substitution-led growth model in 1991, and increasingly integrated itself with the world economy. 1 1 The views expressed by the authors are personal and in no way represent the same of their respective institutes. While the country’s GDP growth is commendable in global comparison, devolution of actual development at the state level is a relevant research question. It is argued that India’s poor growth prospect in recent times is a result of the counterproductive policies adopted over the last decade, particularly since 2009. The present analysis contributes to this debate by exploring two key questions. First, it enquires how the government’s social sector policies, measured by inflation-adjusted average per capita social sector expenditure (PCSSE) and per capita grants-in-aid disbursement (PCGAD), contribute to economic development, as reflected through inflation and inequality-adjusted monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE), across various states over the last two decades. Second, the paper also attempts to explain the influence of development dynamics, as reflected through growth in MPCE, on general election outcomes. The analysis indicates that government policies in the social sector influence the development process, which in turn may affect general election outcomes. Given these findings, it is argued that there is room for introspection on recent restructuring of centre–state financial devolutions.","PeriodicalId":243965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Economic Development Influence General Election Outcomes? Evidence from Consumption Expenditure Trends of Indian States\",\"authors\":\"S. Mukherjee, D. Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2455133317703206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract India left aside the economic philosophy of the import-substitution-led growth model in 1991, and increasingly integrated itself with the world economy. 1 1 The views expressed by the authors are personal and in no way represent the same of their respective institutes. While the country’s GDP growth is commendable in global comparison, devolution of actual development at the state level is a relevant research question. It is argued that India’s poor growth prospect in recent times is a result of the counterproductive policies adopted over the last decade, particularly since 2009. The present analysis contributes to this debate by exploring two key questions. First, it enquires how the government’s social sector policies, measured by inflation-adjusted average per capita social sector expenditure (PCSSE) and per capita grants-in-aid disbursement (PCGAD), contribute to economic development, as reflected through inflation and inequality-adjusted monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE), across various states over the last two decades. Second, the paper also attempts to explain the influence of development dynamics, as reflected through growth in MPCE, on general election outcomes. The analysis indicates that government policies in the social sector influence the development process, which in turn may affect general election outcomes. Given these findings, it is argued that there is room for introspection on recent restructuring of centre–state financial devolutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133317703206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133317703206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1991年,印度抛弃了以进口替代为主导的增长模式的经济哲学,日益融入世界经济。作者所表达的观点是个人观点,不代表他们各自研究所的观点。虽然该国的GDP增长在全球比较中是值得称赞的,但在国家层面上实际发展的权力下放是一个相关的研究问题。有人认为,印度近年来糟糕的增长前景是过去十年(尤其是2009年以来)采取的适得其反的政策的结果。本分析通过探讨两个关键问题有助于这场辩论。首先,通过通货膨胀调整后的平均人均社会部门支出(PCSSE)和人均援助补助金支出(PCGAD)来衡量政府的社会部门政策,通过通货膨胀和不平等调整后的月人均消费支出(MPCE)反映了过去二十年来各州的经济发展。其次,本文还试图解释通过MPCE的增长所反映的发展动态对大选结果的影响。分析表明,政府在社会部门的政策影响着发展进程,而发展进程又可能影响到大选结果。鉴于这些发现,有人认为,对最近中央政府财政权力下放的重组有反思的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Economic Development Influence General Election Outcomes? Evidence from Consumption Expenditure Trends of Indian States
Abstract India left aside the economic philosophy of the import-substitution-led growth model in 1991, and increasingly integrated itself with the world economy. 1 1 The views expressed by the authors are personal and in no way represent the same of their respective institutes. While the country’s GDP growth is commendable in global comparison, devolution of actual development at the state level is a relevant research question. It is argued that India’s poor growth prospect in recent times is a result of the counterproductive policies adopted over the last decade, particularly since 2009. The present analysis contributes to this debate by exploring two key questions. First, it enquires how the government’s social sector policies, measured by inflation-adjusted average per capita social sector expenditure (PCSSE) and per capita grants-in-aid disbursement (PCGAD), contribute to economic development, as reflected through inflation and inequality-adjusted monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE), across various states over the last two decades. Second, the paper also attempts to explain the influence of development dynamics, as reflected through growth in MPCE, on general election outcomes. The analysis indicates that government policies in the social sector influence the development process, which in turn may affect general election outcomes. Given these findings, it is argued that there is room for introspection on recent restructuring of centre–state financial devolutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信