政府补贴计划的影响:可获得性超出可承受性

Ping Xiao, Ruli Xiao, Yitian Liang, Xinlei Chen, W. Lu
{"title":"政府补贴计划的影响:可获得性超出可承受性","authors":"Ping Xiao, Ruli Xiao, Yitian Liang, Xinlei Chen, W. Lu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3368107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rural consumers may face not only the challenge of affordability but also the problem of limited accessibility. Can a government’s subsidy program effectively address these issues? This paper examines the impact of a large-scale subsidy program, “Household Electrical Appliances Going to the Countryside,” offered by the Chinese government. The government regulation imposes price subsidy combined with price ceiling on products in the program. We consider two effects of the subsidy: lowering the retail price to make the product more affordable to consumers and encouraging manufacturers to expand their distribution coverage to make products more accessible to consumers. We build a dynamic model of oligopoly to study how firms adjust their distribution coverage. Conditional on the model estimates, we evaluate the program’s effects on social welfare, consumer surplus, and firms’ market performance and marketing channel decisions through counterfactual analyses. We find that the subsidy program increases social welfare by CNY¥ 0.209 billion, as a result of a subsidy expense of CNY¥ 0.236 billion. When breaking down the impact, we find it increases consumer surplus by CNY¥ 0.184 billion (50%), manufacturers’ profits by CNY¥ 0.125 billion (53%) and manufacturers’ payoff by CNY¥ 2.5 million (17%). Specifically, 14% (13.2%) of the consumer surplus (firm profit) increase are from changes in distribution coverage, and the rest is from the subsidy (price changes). The program’s return of investment (i.e., social welfare minus subsidy expense), which is negative, however, could be improved by applying a relatively lower subsidy rate.","PeriodicalId":403078,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility beyond Affordability\",\"authors\":\"Ping Xiao, Ruli Xiao, Yitian Liang, Xinlei Chen, W. Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3368107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rural consumers may face not only the challenge of affordability but also the problem of limited accessibility. Can a government’s subsidy program effectively address these issues? This paper examines the impact of a large-scale subsidy program, “Household Electrical Appliances Going to the Countryside,” offered by the Chinese government. The government regulation imposes price subsidy combined with price ceiling on products in the program. We consider two effects of the subsidy: lowering the retail price to make the product more affordable to consumers and encouraging manufacturers to expand their distribution coverage to make products more accessible to consumers. We build a dynamic model of oligopoly to study how firms adjust their distribution coverage. Conditional on the model estimates, we evaluate the program’s effects on social welfare, consumer surplus, and firms’ market performance and marketing channel decisions through counterfactual analyses. We find that the subsidy program increases social welfare by CNY¥ 0.209 billion, as a result of a subsidy expense of CNY¥ 0.236 billion. When breaking down the impact, we find it increases consumer surplus by CNY¥ 0.184 billion (50%), manufacturers’ profits by CNY¥ 0.125 billion (53%) and manufacturers’ payoff by CNY¥ 2.5 million (17%). Specifically, 14% (13.2%) of the consumer surplus (firm profit) increase are from changes in distribution coverage, and the rest is from the subsidy (price changes). The program’s return of investment (i.e., social welfare minus subsidy expense), which is negative, however, could be improved by applying a relatively lower subsidy rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村消费者可能不仅面临负担能力的挑战,还面临可及性有限的问题。政府的补贴计划能有效地解决这些问题吗?本文考察了中国政府提供的“家电下乡”大规模补贴计划的影响。政府规定对该计划中的产品实行价格补贴和价格上限。我们考虑了补贴的两种影响:降低零售价格,使消费者更能负担得起产品;鼓励制造商扩大分销范围,使消费者更容易获得产品。本文建立了寡头垄断的动态模型,研究企业如何调整其分销覆盖范围。在模型估计的条件下,我们通过反事实分析评估了该计划对社会福利、消费者剩余、企业市场绩效和营销渠道决策的影响。我们发现,由于补贴费用为2.36亿元,该补贴计划增加了2.09亿元的社会福利。在对影响进行细分时,我们发现消费者剩余增加1.84亿元(50%),制造商利润增加1.25亿元(53%),制造商收益增加250万元(17%)。具体来说,消费者剩余(企业利润)增长的14%(13.2%)来自分配覆盖面的变化,其余来自补贴(价格变化)。然而,该计划的投资回报(即社会福利减去补贴费用)为负,可以通过采用相对较低的补贴率来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility beyond Affordability
Rural consumers may face not only the challenge of affordability but also the problem of limited accessibility. Can a government’s subsidy program effectively address these issues? This paper examines the impact of a large-scale subsidy program, “Household Electrical Appliances Going to the Countryside,” offered by the Chinese government. The government regulation imposes price subsidy combined with price ceiling on products in the program. We consider two effects of the subsidy: lowering the retail price to make the product more affordable to consumers and encouraging manufacturers to expand their distribution coverage to make products more accessible to consumers. We build a dynamic model of oligopoly to study how firms adjust their distribution coverage. Conditional on the model estimates, we evaluate the program’s effects on social welfare, consumer surplus, and firms’ market performance and marketing channel decisions through counterfactual analyses. We find that the subsidy program increases social welfare by CNY¥ 0.209 billion, as a result of a subsidy expense of CNY¥ 0.236 billion. When breaking down the impact, we find it increases consumer surplus by CNY¥ 0.184 billion (50%), manufacturers’ profits by CNY¥ 0.125 billion (53%) and manufacturers’ payoff by CNY¥ 2.5 million (17%). Specifically, 14% (13.2%) of the consumer surplus (firm profit) increase are from changes in distribution coverage, and the rest is from the subsidy (price changes). The program’s return of investment (i.e., social welfare minus subsidy expense), which is negative, however, could be improved by applying a relatively lower subsidy rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信