拉丁语作为社会分化和认知不对称的工具

F. Orletti
{"title":"拉丁语作为社会分化和认知不对称的工具","authors":"F. Orletti","doi":"10.1075/LD.00034.ORL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper aims to present the outcome of a research on the persistence of Latin in Medical Language. The analysis\n has been carried out on written and spoken data: clinical records; doctor-patient interactions; prescriptions; package information\n leaflets. The study shows that in medical communication Latin is used as a tool for social and epistemic discrimination, to\n increase the knowledge gap among professionals and lay people. A different way to reaffirm the voice of medicine against the voice\n of life. Our project is inserted in the series of studies dedicated to languages for specific purposes understood not only as\n specific vocabularies but mostly as “discursive patterns” that express precise and distinctive professional visions.","PeriodicalId":127151,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue in institutional settings","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latin as a tool for social differentiation and epistemic asymmetry\",\"authors\":\"F. Orletti\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LD.00034.ORL\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper aims to present the outcome of a research on the persistence of Latin in Medical Language. The analysis\\n has been carried out on written and spoken data: clinical records; doctor-patient interactions; prescriptions; package information\\n leaflets. The study shows that in medical communication Latin is used as a tool for social and epistemic discrimination, to\\n increase the knowledge gap among professionals and lay people. A different way to reaffirm the voice of medicine against the voice\\n of life. Our project is inserted in the series of studies dedicated to languages for specific purposes understood not only as\\n specific vocabularies but mostly as “discursive patterns” that express precise and distinctive professional visions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogue in institutional settings\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogue in institutional settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LD.00034.ORL\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogue in institutional settings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LD.00034.ORL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在介绍拉丁文在医学语言中持续存在的研究结果。对书面和口头数据进行了分析:临床记录;医患互动;处方;包装资料单张。研究表明,在医学传播中,拉丁语被用作社会和认知歧视的工具,增加了专业人员和非专业人员之间的知识差距。用不同的方式重申医学的声音对抗生命的声音。我们的项目是一系列致力于特定目的的语言研究的一部分,这些语言不仅被理解为特定的词汇,而且主要被理解为表达精确而独特的专业愿景的“话语模式”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latin as a tool for social differentiation and epistemic asymmetry
The paper aims to present the outcome of a research on the persistence of Latin in Medical Language. The analysis has been carried out on written and spoken data: clinical records; doctor-patient interactions; prescriptions; package information leaflets. The study shows that in medical communication Latin is used as a tool for social and epistemic discrimination, to increase the knowledge gap among professionals and lay people. A different way to reaffirm the voice of medicine against the voice of life. Our project is inserted in the series of studies dedicated to languages for specific purposes understood not only as specific vocabularies but mostly as “discursive patterns” that express precise and distinctive professional visions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信