Juridical Analysis of The Obligations of The Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board in Resolving Complaints of Patient Losses

. In Law No.29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice in Indonesia, Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board (IMDB) is assigned as an autonomous organization approved to decide mistakes in the utilization of clinical disciplines did by specialists and dental specialists. The obligations of IMDB needs to be initiated in order to optimize the tasks of the IMDB and resolving complaints about patient losses. This IMDB obligation need to be initiated because the absence of regulation regarding IMDB obligation causes the independence of the IMDB become a public problem that is widely questioned. This in turn will potentially make IMDB able to act arbitrarily and if it were a super body. In addition, IMDB is often giddy and acts beyond its authority because IMDB is not exposed to the spirit of a balance of rights and obligations. To examine and analyze how the IMDB obligations are set for the settlement of complaints about patient losses in the context of optimizing the duties and functions of the IMDB and how the legal structure of the IMDB’s decisions in the context of enforcing disciplinary sanctions of the medical profession on doctors and dentists who violate professional disciplines, research has been carried out using normative juridical methods, analytical descriptive specifications and prescriptive analytical, statutory approach method, limited empirical and conceptual. The regulation of the IMDB’s obligations for the settlement of complaints about patient losses has not been comprehensively regulated in the existing regulatory instruments. The legitimate situation of the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board's choice with regards to implementing disciplinary approvals on the clinical calling on specialists and dental specialists has not been obviously and unambiguously depicted comparable to lawful.