检测或不检测:要变形的正确面孔

N. Damer, Alexandra Mosegui Saladie, Steffen Zienert, Yaza Wainakh, Philipp Terhörst, Florian Kirchbuchner, Arjan Kuijper
{"title":"检测或不检测:要变形的正确面孔","authors":"N. Damer, Alexandra Mosegui Saladie, Steffen Zienert, Yaza Wainakh, Philipp Terhörst, Florian Kirchbuchner, Arjan Kuijper","doi":"10.1109/ICB45273.2019.8987316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent works have studied the face morphing attack detection performance generalization over variations in morphing approaches, image re-digitization, and image source variations. However, these works assumed a constant approach for selecting the images to be morphed (pairing) across their training and testing data. A realistic variation in the pairing protocol in the training data can result in challenges and opportunities for a stable attack detector. This work extensively study this issue by building a novel database with three different pairing protocols and two different morphing approaches. We study the detection generalization over these variations for single image and differential attack detection, along with handcrafted and CNN-based features. Our observations included that training an attack detection solution on attacks created from dissimilar face images, in contrary to the common practice, can result in an overall more generalized detection performance. Moreover, we found that differential attack detection is very sensitive to variations in morphing and pairing protocols.","PeriodicalId":430846,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Detect or not to Detect: The Right Faces to Morph\",\"authors\":\"N. Damer, Alexandra Mosegui Saladie, Steffen Zienert, Yaza Wainakh, Philipp Terhörst, Florian Kirchbuchner, Arjan Kuijper\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICB45273.2019.8987316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent works have studied the face morphing attack detection performance generalization over variations in morphing approaches, image re-digitization, and image source variations. However, these works assumed a constant approach for selecting the images to be morphed (pairing) across their training and testing data. A realistic variation in the pairing protocol in the training data can result in challenges and opportunities for a stable attack detector. This work extensively study this issue by building a novel database with three different pairing protocols and two different morphing approaches. We study the detection generalization over these variations for single image and differential attack detection, along with handcrafted and CNN-based features. Our observations included that training an attack detection solution on attacks created from dissimilar face images, in contrary to the common practice, can result in an overall more generalized detection performance. Moreover, we found that differential attack detection is very sensitive to variations in morphing and pairing protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB45273.2019.8987316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB45273.2019.8987316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

近年来研究了人脸变形攻击检测在变形方法变化、图像再数字化和图像源变化等方面的性能泛化。然而,这些工作假设了一种恒定的方法来选择要在训练和测试数据中变形(配对)的图像。训练数据中配对协议的实际变化可能会给稳定的攻击检测器带来挑战和机遇。本文采用三种不同的配对协议和两种不同的变形方法构建了一个新的数据库,对这一问题进行了广泛的研究。我们研究了这些变化的检测泛化,用于单图像和差分攻击检测,以及手工制作和基于cnn的特征。我们的观察包括,与通常的做法相反,针对不同人脸图像创建的攻击训练攻击检测解决方案可以导致总体上更一般化的检测性能。此外,我们发现差分攻击检测对变形和配对协议的变化非常敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Detect or not to Detect: The Right Faces to Morph
Recent works have studied the face morphing attack detection performance generalization over variations in morphing approaches, image re-digitization, and image source variations. However, these works assumed a constant approach for selecting the images to be morphed (pairing) across their training and testing data. A realistic variation in the pairing protocol in the training data can result in challenges and opportunities for a stable attack detector. This work extensively study this issue by building a novel database with three different pairing protocols and two different morphing approaches. We study the detection generalization over these variations for single image and differential attack detection, along with handcrafted and CNN-based features. Our observations included that training an attack detection solution on attacks created from dissimilar face images, in contrary to the common practice, can result in an overall more generalized detection performance. Moreover, we found that differential attack detection is very sensitive to variations in morphing and pairing protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信