Monika Nováková, P. Němec, L. Oliveriusová, F. Sedláček
{"title":"全黑暗条件下,小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸小圆胸","authors":"Monika Nováková, P. Němec, L. Oliveriusová, F. Sedláček","doi":"10.37520/lynx.2022.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our knowledge about magnetoreception in mammals remains limited. Among rodents, magnetic compass orientation has been documented in four subterranean mole-rats and four epigeic (i.e., active above ground) species. While it is well established that the magnetic compass of mole-rats is light-independent and magnetite-mediated, recent evidence suggests that a radical pair-based mechanism may underlie magnetic orientation in epigeic rodents. To determine whether the magnetic compass of epigeic rodents is light-dependent, which is thought to be an inherent feature of radical pair-based magnetoreception, we investigated the ability of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Cricetidae) to use magnetic compass orientation in total darkness. The voles, which were allowed to explore/build a nest overnight in a circular arena, did not exhibit any directional preference in the initial stage of the experiments; later they tended to prefer the southern sector of the arena irrespective of magnetic field direction, implying that they relied on nonmagnetic orientation cues. Previous tests (Oliveriusová et al. 2014) in the same environment, but under lighting, showed a significant reaction to a change in the orientation of the magnetic field. On the basis of the presented study in comparison with the previous one, it can be concluded that bank voles do not use the magnetic compass for near-space orientation in darkness and thus support evidence for light-dependent magnetoreception in a mammal.","PeriodicalId":122460,"journal":{"name":"Lynx new series","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No expression of magnetic compass orientation in Clethrionomys glareolus in total darkness (Rodentia: Cricetidae)\",\"authors\":\"Monika Nováková, P. Němec, L. Oliveriusová, F. Sedláček\",\"doi\":\"10.37520/lynx.2022.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our knowledge about magnetoreception in mammals remains limited. Among rodents, magnetic compass orientation has been documented in four subterranean mole-rats and four epigeic (i.e., active above ground) species. While it is well established that the magnetic compass of mole-rats is light-independent and magnetite-mediated, recent evidence suggests that a radical pair-based mechanism may underlie magnetic orientation in epigeic rodents. To determine whether the magnetic compass of epigeic rodents is light-dependent, which is thought to be an inherent feature of radical pair-based magnetoreception, we investigated the ability of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Cricetidae) to use magnetic compass orientation in total darkness. The voles, which were allowed to explore/build a nest overnight in a circular arena, did not exhibit any directional preference in the initial stage of the experiments; later they tended to prefer the southern sector of the arena irrespective of magnetic field direction, implying that they relied on nonmagnetic orientation cues. Previous tests (Oliveriusová et al. 2014) in the same environment, but under lighting, showed a significant reaction to a change in the orientation of the magnetic field. On the basis of the presented study in comparison with the previous one, it can be concluded that bank voles do not use the magnetic compass for near-space orientation in darkness and thus support evidence for light-dependent magnetoreception in a mammal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lynx new series\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lynx new series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37520/lynx.2022.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lynx new series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37520/lynx.2022.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们对哺乳动物的磁感受的了解仍然有限。在啮齿类动物中,已在四种地下鼹鼠和四种地上鼹鼠(即活跃的地上鼹鼠)中记录了磁罗盘定向。虽然鼹鼠的磁罗盘与光无关且由磁铁矿介导,但最近的证据表明,一种基于对的根本机制可能是后生啮齿动物磁定向的基础。为了确定后生啮齿类动物的磁罗盘是否依赖于光,这被认为是基于自由基对的磁接受的固有特征,我们研究了银田鼠在完全黑暗中使用磁罗盘定向的能力。田鼠被允许在一个圆形的竞技场里过夜探索/筑巢,在实验的初始阶段,田鼠没有表现出任何方向偏好;后来,不管磁场方向如何,它们都倾向于选择舞台的南部,这意味着它们依赖于非磁场方向线索。先前的测试(oliverusov et al. 2014)在相同的环境下,但在照明下,显示出对磁场方向变化的显着反应。在此基础上,本研究与先前的研究结果进行了比较,可以得出结论,银行田鼠在黑暗中不使用磁罗盘进行近空间定位,从而支持哺乳动物依赖光的磁感受的证据。
No expression of magnetic compass orientation in Clethrionomys glareolus in total darkness (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Our knowledge about magnetoreception in mammals remains limited. Among rodents, magnetic compass orientation has been documented in four subterranean mole-rats and four epigeic (i.e., active above ground) species. While it is well established that the magnetic compass of mole-rats is light-independent and magnetite-mediated, recent evidence suggests that a radical pair-based mechanism may underlie magnetic orientation in epigeic rodents. To determine whether the magnetic compass of epigeic rodents is light-dependent, which is thought to be an inherent feature of radical pair-based magnetoreception, we investigated the ability of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Cricetidae) to use magnetic compass orientation in total darkness. The voles, which were allowed to explore/build a nest overnight in a circular arena, did not exhibit any directional preference in the initial stage of the experiments; later they tended to prefer the southern sector of the arena irrespective of magnetic field direction, implying that they relied on nonmagnetic orientation cues. Previous tests (Oliveriusová et al. 2014) in the same environment, but under lighting, showed a significant reaction to a change in the orientation of the magnetic field. On the basis of the presented study in comparison with the previous one, it can be concluded that bank voles do not use the magnetic compass for near-space orientation in darkness and thus support evidence for light-dependent magnetoreception in a mammal.