伦敦市场竞争激烈吗?伦敦做市商交易行为研究

Rosita P. Chang, Chunlin Liu, S. Rhee
{"title":"伦敦市场竞争激烈吗?伦敦做市商交易行为研究","authors":"Rosita P. Chang, Chunlin Liu, S. Rhee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.246457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Study of Trading Behavior of London Market Makers Abstract This study examines the competitiveness of the London Stock Exchange (LSE) on the basis of trading activities of different market makers for a sample of FTSE-100 component stocks. Specifically, the relations studied between market shares of individual market makers and their price- and quantity-setting behavior, preferenced trading activities, and trading profitability infer the competitiveness of the London market. The results show that market makers can obtain relative larger shares of public order flows through posting more competitive prices with greater quote depths. No evidence is found to support that preferenced trading distort the market shares of trading among market makers because it is limited to small-sized trades. However, this study does suggest that those market makers who takes more trading risks are not only rewarded with larger market shares of public order flows but also compensated with higher spread profit margins. The overall findings from the study indicate that the LSE is a competitive dealership market.","PeriodicalId":126917,"journal":{"name":"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the London Market Competitive? A Study of Trading Behavior of London Market Makers\",\"authors\":\"Rosita P. Chang, Chunlin Liu, S. Rhee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.246457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Study of Trading Behavior of London Market Makers Abstract This study examines the competitiveness of the London Stock Exchange (LSE) on the basis of trading activities of different market makers for a sample of FTSE-100 component stocks. Specifically, the relations studied between market shares of individual market makers and their price- and quantity-setting behavior, preferenced trading activities, and trading profitability infer the competitiveness of the London market. The results show that market makers can obtain relative larger shares of public order flows through posting more competitive prices with greater quote depths. No evidence is found to support that preferenced trading distort the market shares of trading among market makers because it is limited to small-sized trades. However, this study does suggest that those market makers who takes more trading risks are not only rewarded with larger market shares of public order flows but also compensated with higher spread profit margins. The overall findings from the study indicate that the LSE is a competitive dealership market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.246457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Financial Management Association Meetings (EFMA) (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.246457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要本研究以富时100指数成分股为样本,以不同做市商的交易活动为基础,考察伦敦证券交易所(LSE)的竞争力。具体而言,通过研究个体做市商的市场份额与其定价定量行为、偏好交易活动和交易盈利能力之间的关系,可以推断出伦敦市场的竞争力。结果表明,做市商可以通过报价深度越大、价格越有竞争力来获得相对较大的公共订单流量份额。没有证据支持优先交易扭曲了做市商之间交易的市场份额,因为它仅限于小规模交易。然而,本研究确实表明,那些承担更多交易风险的做市商不仅可以获得更大的公共订单流市场份额,还可以获得更高的点差利润率。研究的总体结果表明,伦敦经济学院是一个竞争激烈的经销商市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the London Market Competitive? A Study of Trading Behavior of London Market Makers
A Study of Trading Behavior of London Market Makers Abstract This study examines the competitiveness of the London Stock Exchange (LSE) on the basis of trading activities of different market makers for a sample of FTSE-100 component stocks. Specifically, the relations studied between market shares of individual market makers and their price- and quantity-setting behavior, preferenced trading activities, and trading profitability infer the competitiveness of the London market. The results show that market makers can obtain relative larger shares of public order flows through posting more competitive prices with greater quote depths. No evidence is found to support that preferenced trading distort the market shares of trading among market makers because it is limited to small-sized trades. However, this study does suggest that those market makers who takes more trading risks are not only rewarded with larger market shares of public order flows but also compensated with higher spread profit margins. The overall findings from the study indicate that the LSE is a competitive dealership market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信