脑电信号对认知疲劳的分类

A. Ekim, Önder Aydemir, Mengu Demir
{"title":"脑电信号对认知疲劳的分类","authors":"A. Ekim, Önder Aydemir, Mengu Demir","doi":"10.1109/TIPTEKNO50054.2020.9299239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive fatigue is the natural result of longtime mental effort during the execution of a high mental workload or a strenuous task. This situation often leads to decreased productivity and increased security risks. In this study, it was aimed to detect cognitive fatigue quickly and accurately, regardless of subjective data. CogBeacon dataset was used for this. Data that make up the CogBeacon dataset were collected from 19 participants in 76 sessions with the help of a 4-electrode MUSE electroencephalography (EEG) device. The collected raw EEGs were randomly separated and feature extraction was performed. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms were used in the classification process. Katz and Higuchi Fractal Dimension, standard deviation, median, variance and covariance were tested as features. When the classification was made with SVM, the education average was 93.99% and the test average was 83.14%. The average success rate increased between 4.43% and 7.40%, compared to the trials that were not used in the trials where Fractal Dimension features were used. When the classification was made with KNN, the education averange was 91.71% and the test average was 83.34%. The average success rate increased between 5.10% and 8.92% compared to the trials that were not used in the trials in which Fractal Dimension features were used.","PeriodicalId":426945,"journal":{"name":"2020 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Cognitive Fatigue with EEG Signals\",\"authors\":\"A. Ekim, Önder Aydemir, Mengu Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIPTEKNO50054.2020.9299239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive fatigue is the natural result of longtime mental effort during the execution of a high mental workload or a strenuous task. This situation often leads to decreased productivity and increased security risks. In this study, it was aimed to detect cognitive fatigue quickly and accurately, regardless of subjective data. CogBeacon dataset was used for this. Data that make up the CogBeacon dataset were collected from 19 participants in 76 sessions with the help of a 4-electrode MUSE electroencephalography (EEG) device. The collected raw EEGs were randomly separated and feature extraction was performed. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms were used in the classification process. Katz and Higuchi Fractal Dimension, standard deviation, median, variance and covariance were tested as features. When the classification was made with SVM, the education average was 93.99% and the test average was 83.14%. The average success rate increased between 4.43% and 7.40%, compared to the trials that were not used in the trials where Fractal Dimension features were used. When the classification was made with KNN, the education averange was 91.71% and the test average was 83.34%. The average success rate increased between 5.10% and 8.92% compared to the trials that were not used in the trials in which Fractal Dimension features were used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIPTEKNO50054.2020.9299239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIPTEKNO50054.2020.9299239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

认知疲劳是在执行高脑力工作量或高强度任务时长期脑力劳动的自然结果。这种情况经常导致生产力下降和安全风险增加。在本研究中,旨在快速准确地检测认知疲劳,而不考虑主观数据。为此使用了CogBeacon数据集。组成CogBeacon数据集的数据是在4电极MUSE脑电图(EEG)设备的帮助下从76次会议的19名参与者中收集的。将收集到的原始脑电图随机分离并进行特征提取。在分类过程中使用了支持向量机(SVM)和k-最近邻(KNN)算法。以Katz和Higuchi分形维数、标准差、中位数、方差和协方差为特征进行检验。使用SVM进行分类时,教育平均为93.99%,测试平均为83.14%。在使用分形维特征的试验中,与不使用分形维特征的试验相比,平均成功率增加了4.43%到7.40%。用KNN分类时,受教育平均为91.71%,测试平均为83.34%。在使用分形维数特征的试验中,与不使用分形维数特征的试验相比,平均成功率提高了5.10% ~ 8.92%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification of Cognitive Fatigue with EEG Signals
Cognitive fatigue is the natural result of longtime mental effort during the execution of a high mental workload or a strenuous task. This situation often leads to decreased productivity and increased security risks. In this study, it was aimed to detect cognitive fatigue quickly and accurately, regardless of subjective data. CogBeacon dataset was used for this. Data that make up the CogBeacon dataset were collected from 19 participants in 76 sessions with the help of a 4-electrode MUSE electroencephalography (EEG) device. The collected raw EEGs were randomly separated and feature extraction was performed. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms were used in the classification process. Katz and Higuchi Fractal Dimension, standard deviation, median, variance and covariance were tested as features. When the classification was made with SVM, the education average was 93.99% and the test average was 83.14%. The average success rate increased between 4.43% and 7.40%, compared to the trials that were not used in the trials where Fractal Dimension features were used. When the classification was made with KNN, the education averange was 91.71% and the test average was 83.34%. The average success rate increased between 5.10% and 8.92% compared to the trials that were not used in the trials in which Fractal Dimension features were used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信