独立于混淆:多样性的语义框架

Riccardo Pucella, F. Schneider
{"title":"独立于混淆:多样性的语义框架","authors":"Riccardo Pucella, F. Schneider","doi":"10.3233/JCS-2009-0379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A set of replicas is diverse to the extent that all implement the same functionality but differ in their implementation details. Diverse replicas are less prone to having vulnerabilities in common, because attacks typically depend on memory layout and/or instruction-sequence specifics. Recent work advocates using mechanical means, such as program rewriting, to create such diversity. A correspondence between the specific transformations being employed and the attacks they defend against is often provided, but little has been said about the overall effectiveness of diversity per se in defending against attacks. With this broader goal in mind, we here give a precise characterization of attacks, applicable to viewing diversity as a defense, and also show how mechanically-generated diversity compares to a well-understood defense: strong typing","PeriodicalId":131951,"journal":{"name":"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independence from obfuscation: a semantic framework for diversity\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Pucella, F. Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JCS-2009-0379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A set of replicas is diverse to the extent that all implement the same functionality but differ in their implementation details. Diverse replicas are less prone to having vulnerabilities in common, because attacks typically depend on memory layout and/or instruction-sequence specifics. Recent work advocates using mechanical means, such as program rewriting, to create such diversity. A correspondence between the specific transformations being employed and the attacks they defend against is often provided, but little has been said about the overall effectiveness of diversity per se in defending against attacks. With this broader goal in mind, we here give a precise characterization of attacks, applicable to viewing diversity as a defense, and also show how mechanically-generated diversity compares to a well-understood defense: strong typing\",\"PeriodicalId\":131951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JCS-2009-0379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JCS-2009-0379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

一组副本是多种多样的,它们都实现相同的功能,但在实现细节上有所不同。不同的副本不太容易有共同的漏洞,因为攻击通常依赖于内存布局和/或指令序列细节。最近的工作主张使用机械手段,如程序重写,来创造这种多样性。所采用的特定转换与它们所防御的攻击之间的对应关系经常被提供,但很少有人谈到多样性本身在防御攻击方面的总体有效性。考虑到这个更广泛的目标,我们在这里给出了攻击的精确特征,适用于将多样性视为一种防御,并且还展示了如何将机械生成的多样性与一种众所周知的防御(强类型)进行比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independence from obfuscation: a semantic framework for diversity
A set of replicas is diverse to the extent that all implement the same functionality but differ in their implementation details. Diverse replicas are less prone to having vulnerabilities in common, because attacks typically depend on memory layout and/or instruction-sequence specifics. Recent work advocates using mechanical means, such as program rewriting, to create such diversity. A correspondence between the specific transformations being employed and the attacks they defend against is often provided, but little has been said about the overall effectiveness of diversity per se in defending against attacks. With this broader goal in mind, we here give a precise characterization of attacks, applicable to viewing diversity as a defense, and also show how mechanically-generated diversity compares to a well-understood defense: strong typing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信