TYPES OF FORM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: UPDATING DOCTRINAL APPROACHES

The article poses the question of updating approaches to types of forms of public administration. Therelationship between legal and organizational forms of public administration is established. The latter term is proposed to use insteadof the commonly used phrase "unlawful forms of public administration", which is used to denote those external manifestations of the activity of public administration bodies, which does not entail a direct legal consequence. The critique of the term "illegal forms of public administration" has been supported. It is stated that the perception of organizational forms as not causing legal consequences does not fully reflect the legal validity. Separate organizational forms are defined by law as the solepossible for the adoption of certain types of administrative decisions by collegiate bodies of public administration, and their non-compliance leads to the nullity of further legal form. The given group of forms of activity of the public administration has a special legal nature and significance for objectification of the legal activity of the subjects of public administration, in connection with which such a group is proposed to be terminated as "structural forms of public administration". The given justifications of the relevant term are presented as debatable. It was emphasized that the failure of organizational forms to cause legal consequences in the field of public administration does not in any way deprive their properties of causing legal consequences in the private legal relations. It is noted that public administration can act in public-law and private law forms, and forms of public administration are only a part of public-law forms, which include other types of legal forms, the use of which is provided for by the rules of the current legislation. It was concluded that public administration as a concept of functioning of executive bodies, local self-government bodies and their relations with civil society significantly changed the interrelationships of legal and organizational forms of public administration and strengthened them to such an extent that it is sometimes impossible to draw a clear line between these types forms.