基于文本的说话人验证重放攻击与防欺骗研究

Zhizheng Wu, Sheng Gao, Eng Siong Cling, Haizhou Li
{"title":"基于文本的说话人验证重放攻击与防欺骗研究","authors":"Zhizheng Wu, Sheng Gao, Eng Siong Cling, Haizhou Li","doi":"10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Replay, which is to playback a pre-recorded speech sample, presents a genuine risk to automatic speaker verification technology. In this study, we evaluate the vulnerability of text-dependent speaker verification systems under the replay attack using a standard benchmarking database, and also propose an anti-spoofing technique to safeguard the speaker verification systems. The key idea of the spoofing detection technique is to decide whether the presented sample is matched to any previous stored speech samples based a similarity score. The experiments conducted on the RSR2015 database showed that the equal error rate (EER) and false acceptance rate (FAR) increased from both 2.92 % to 25.56 % and 78.36 % respectively as a result of the replay attack. It confirmed the vulnerability of speaker verification to replay attacks. On the other hand, our proposed spoofing countermeasure was able to reduce the FARs from 78.36 % and 73.14 % to 0.06 % and 0.0 % for male and female systems, respectively, in the face of replay spoofing. The experiments confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed anti-spoofing technique.","PeriodicalId":231382,"journal":{"name":"Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"157","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on replay attack and anti-spoofing for text-dependent speaker verification\",\"authors\":\"Zhizheng Wu, Sheng Gao, Eng Siong Cling, Haizhou Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Replay, which is to playback a pre-recorded speech sample, presents a genuine risk to automatic speaker verification technology. In this study, we evaluate the vulnerability of text-dependent speaker verification systems under the replay attack using a standard benchmarking database, and also propose an anti-spoofing technique to safeguard the speaker verification systems. The key idea of the spoofing detection technique is to decide whether the presented sample is matched to any previous stored speech samples based a similarity score. The experiments conducted on the RSR2015 database showed that the equal error rate (EER) and false acceptance rate (FAR) increased from both 2.92 % to 25.56 % and 78.36 % respectively as a result of the replay attack. It confirmed the vulnerability of speaker verification to replay attacks. On the other hand, our proposed spoofing countermeasure was able to reduce the FARs from 78.36 % and 73.14 % to 0.06 % and 0.0 % for male and female systems, respectively, in the face of replay spoofing. The experiments confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed anti-spoofing technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"157\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 157

摘要

重放,即回放预先录制的语音样本,对自动说话人验证技术存在真正的风险。在本研究中,我们使用标准基准数据库评估了文本依赖的说话人验证系统在重放攻击下的脆弱性,并提出了一种防欺骗技术来保护说话人验证系统。欺骗检测技术的关键思想是根据相似度评分来判断所呈现的样本是否与之前存储的语音样本相匹配。在RSR2015数据库上进行的实验表明,受重放攻击的影响,等错误率(EER)和误接受率(FAR)分别从2.92%增加到25.56%和78.36%。它证实了说话人验证对重放攻击的脆弱性。另一方面,我们提出的欺骗对策能够将男性和女性系统的FARs分别从78.36%和73.14%降低到0.06%和0.0%,面对重放欺骗。实验验证了所提出的抗欺骗技术的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on replay attack and anti-spoofing for text-dependent speaker verification
Replay, which is to playback a pre-recorded speech sample, presents a genuine risk to automatic speaker verification technology. In this study, we evaluate the vulnerability of text-dependent speaker verification systems under the replay attack using a standard benchmarking database, and also propose an anti-spoofing technique to safeguard the speaker verification systems. The key idea of the spoofing detection technique is to decide whether the presented sample is matched to any previous stored speech samples based a similarity score. The experiments conducted on the RSR2015 database showed that the equal error rate (EER) and false acceptance rate (FAR) increased from both 2.92 % to 25.56 % and 78.36 % respectively as a result of the replay attack. It confirmed the vulnerability of speaker verification to replay attacks. On the other hand, our proposed spoofing countermeasure was able to reduce the FARs from 78.36 % and 73.14 % to 0.06 % and 0.0 % for male and female systems, respectively, in the face of replay spoofing. The experiments confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed anti-spoofing technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信