土地所有权方面的刑法重新实施

Suhartati -
{"title":"土地所有权方面的刑法重新实施","authors":"Suhartati -","doi":"10.25105/prio.v4i1.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outgrowth of corruption cases in Indonesia both quantity and quality has involving several business sectors such as land sectors. The complexity of land sector problems dealing with administrative law, civil law, and criminal law directing as the object of corruption cases. Considering the land-ownership as one of valuables assets which has economical value could create legal problems within individual, corporation, or state. The precious value of land even causing some actions with the state loss as a negative impact. Through some cases in Indonesian, several actions related with transferring land-ownership even indicated as corruption crime due to state loss impact. Regarding the aforementioned legal phenomenon, this article aim to explore how the land-ownership matters could be implied as corruption crimes and how the corruption criminal law could be implemented.This article is analysing that several legal actions related with land-ownership of state own enterprises or private corporation are not directly pointed as corruption crimes, even though there are state loss inside land-ownership. Corruption crime will be defines upon the occurrence of primary elements based on Article 2 or Article 3 Indonesian Act Number 31 Number 1999 jo Indonesian Act Number 20  Year 2001. Especially the unlawfulness element shall be proven in every act which has purpose of self or corporate enrichment. Reimplementation of corruption criminal law by applying formal unlawfulness element and material unlawfulness element with negative function are needed to the efficacy of combating corruption acts and to avoid over criminalization.","PeriodicalId":335820,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimplementasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Aspek Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah\",\"authors\":\"Suhartati -\",\"doi\":\"10.25105/prio.v4i1.372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The outgrowth of corruption cases in Indonesia both quantity and quality has involving several business sectors such as land sectors. The complexity of land sector problems dealing with administrative law, civil law, and criminal law directing as the object of corruption cases. Considering the land-ownership as one of valuables assets which has economical value could create legal problems within individual, corporation, or state. The precious value of land even causing some actions with the state loss as a negative impact. Through some cases in Indonesian, several actions related with transferring land-ownership even indicated as corruption crime due to state loss impact. Regarding the aforementioned legal phenomenon, this article aim to explore how the land-ownership matters could be implied as corruption crimes and how the corruption criminal law could be implemented.This article is analysing that several legal actions related with land-ownership of state own enterprises or private corporation are not directly pointed as corruption crimes, even though there are state loss inside land-ownership. Corruption crime will be defines upon the occurrence of primary elements based on Article 2 or Article 3 Indonesian Act Number 31 Number 1999 jo Indonesian Act Number 20  Year 2001. Especially the unlawfulness element shall be proven in every act which has purpose of self or corporate enrichment. Reimplementation of corruption criminal law by applying formal unlawfulness element and material unlawfulness element with negative function are needed to the efficacy of combating corruption acts and to avoid over criminalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v4i1.372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v4i1.372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚腐败案件的数量和质量的增长涉及土地部门等几个商业部门。复杂的土地部门问题处理行政法,民法和刑法指导作为腐败案件的对象。将土地所有权视为具有经济价值的贵重资产之一,可能会在个人、公司或国家内部产生法律问题。土地的宝贵价值甚至造成了一些以国家损失为负面影响的行为。在印度尼西亚的一些案例中,由于国家损失的影响,一些与土地所有权转让有关的行动甚至被视为腐败犯罪。针对上述法律现象,本文旨在探讨土地所有权问题如何被暗示为腐败犯罪,以及腐败刑法如何实施。本文分析了一些与国有企业或私营企业的土地所有权有关的法律行为,尽管土地所有权中存在国家损失,但并没有直接指向腐败犯罪。贪污罪将根据1999年第31号法令第2条或第3条以及2001年第20号法令第2条或第3条的规定进行定义。特别是在每一个以个人或公司利益为目的的行为中,都必须证明其违法要件。通过运用具有消极作用的形式违法要件和物质违法要件来重新实施腐败刑法,是打击腐败行为的有效性和避免过度刑事化的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reimplementasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Aspek Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah
The outgrowth of corruption cases in Indonesia both quantity and quality has involving several business sectors such as land sectors. The complexity of land sector problems dealing with administrative law, civil law, and criminal law directing as the object of corruption cases. Considering the land-ownership as one of valuables assets which has economical value could create legal problems within individual, corporation, or state. The precious value of land even causing some actions with the state loss as a negative impact. Through some cases in Indonesian, several actions related with transferring land-ownership even indicated as corruption crime due to state loss impact. Regarding the aforementioned legal phenomenon, this article aim to explore how the land-ownership matters could be implied as corruption crimes and how the corruption criminal law could be implemented.This article is analysing that several legal actions related with land-ownership of state own enterprises or private corporation are not directly pointed as corruption crimes, even though there are state loss inside land-ownership. Corruption crime will be defines upon the occurrence of primary elements based on Article 2 or Article 3 Indonesian Act Number 31 Number 1999 jo Indonesian Act Number 20  Year 2001. Especially the unlawfulness element shall be proven in every act which has purpose of self or corporate enrichment. Reimplementation of corruption criminal law by applying formal unlawfulness element and material unlawfulness element with negative function are needed to the efficacy of combating corruption acts and to avoid over criminalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信