S. Fatimah, Achmad Bernhardo Elzamzami, Joko Slamet
{"title":"泗水SMPN 44学校2019/2020学年9年级学生期末考试项目分析","authors":"S. Fatimah, Achmad Bernhardo Elzamzami, Joko Slamet","doi":"10.51836/JOURNEEL.V2I1.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted by focusing on the formulated question regarding the test scores validity, reliability and item analysis involving the discrimination power and index difficulty in order to provide detail information leading to the improvement of test items construction. The quality of each particular item was analyzed in terms of item difficulty, item discrimination and distractor analysis. The statistical tests were used to compute the reliability of the test by applying The Kuder-Richardson Formula (KR20). The analysis of 50 test items was computed using Microsoft Office Excel. A descriptive method was applied to describe and examined the data. The research findings showed the test fulfilled the criteria of having content validity which was categorized as a low validity. Meanwhile, the reliability value of the test scores was 0.521010831 (0.52) categorized as lower reliability and revision of test. Through the 50 items examined, there were 21 items that were in need of improvement which were classified into “easy” for the index difficulty and “poor” category for the discriminability by the total 26 items (52%). It means more than 50% of the test items need to be revised as the items do not meet the criteria. It is suggested that in order to measure students’ performance effectively, essential improvement need to be evaluated where items with “poor” discrimination index should be reviewed. \n \n ","PeriodicalId":337169,"journal":{"name":"JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Item Analysis of Final Test for the 9th Grade Students of SMPN 44 Surabaya in the Academic Year of 2019/2020\",\"authors\":\"S. Fatimah, Achmad Bernhardo Elzamzami, Joko Slamet\",\"doi\":\"10.51836/JOURNEEL.V2I1.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted by focusing on the formulated question regarding the test scores validity, reliability and item analysis involving the discrimination power and index difficulty in order to provide detail information leading to the improvement of test items construction. The quality of each particular item was analyzed in terms of item difficulty, item discrimination and distractor analysis. The statistical tests were used to compute the reliability of the test by applying The Kuder-Richardson Formula (KR20). The analysis of 50 test items was computed using Microsoft Office Excel. A descriptive method was applied to describe and examined the data. The research findings showed the test fulfilled the criteria of having content validity which was categorized as a low validity. Meanwhile, the reliability value of the test scores was 0.521010831 (0.52) categorized as lower reliability and revision of test. Through the 50 items examined, there were 21 items that were in need of improvement which were classified into “easy” for the index difficulty and “poor” category for the discriminability by the total 26 items (52%). It means more than 50% of the test items need to be revised as the items do not meet the criteria. It is suggested that in order to measure students’ performance effectively, essential improvement need to be evaluated where items with “poor” discrimination index should be reviewed. \\n \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":337169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51836/JOURNEEL.V2I1.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51836/JOURNEEL.V2I1.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
本研究主要从测验分数效度、信度、辨别力、指标难易度的题项分析等方面展开,以期为改进测验题项构建提供详实的信息。从项目难度、项目辨别力和干扰因素分析三个方面分析了每个特定项目的质量。统计检验采用The Kuder-Richardson Formula (KR20)计算检验信度。使用Microsoft Office Excel对50个测试项目进行分析计算。采用描述性方法对数据进行描述和检验。研究结果表明,该测试符合内容效度的标准,被归类为低效度。同时,测试分数的信度值为0.521010831(0.52),属于较低信度和测试的修订。在调查的50个项目中,需要改进的项目有21个,其中指数难度为“容易”,可辨别性为“差”,共有26个项目(52%)。这意味着超过50%的测试项目需要修改,因为这些项目不符合标准。建议为了有效地衡量学生的表现,需要评估本质上的改进,即对“差”歧视指数的项目进行审查。
Item Analysis of Final Test for the 9th Grade Students of SMPN 44 Surabaya in the Academic Year of 2019/2020
This research was conducted by focusing on the formulated question regarding the test scores validity, reliability and item analysis involving the discrimination power and index difficulty in order to provide detail information leading to the improvement of test items construction. The quality of each particular item was analyzed in terms of item difficulty, item discrimination and distractor analysis. The statistical tests were used to compute the reliability of the test by applying The Kuder-Richardson Formula (KR20). The analysis of 50 test items was computed using Microsoft Office Excel. A descriptive method was applied to describe and examined the data. The research findings showed the test fulfilled the criteria of having content validity which was categorized as a low validity. Meanwhile, the reliability value of the test scores was 0.521010831 (0.52) categorized as lower reliability and revision of test. Through the 50 items examined, there were 21 items that were in need of improvement which were classified into “easy” for the index difficulty and “poor” category for the discriminability by the total 26 items (52%). It means more than 50% of the test items need to be revised as the items do not meet the criteria. It is suggested that in order to measure students’ performance effectively, essential improvement need to be evaluated where items with “poor” discrimination index should be reviewed.