多集群中近文件处理器和数据协同分配策略的评估

H. Mohamed, D. Epema
{"title":"多集群中近文件处理器和数据协同分配策略的评估","authors":"H. Mohamed, D. Epema","doi":"10.1109/CLUSTR.2004.1392626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In multicluster systems, and more generally, in grids, jobs may require coallocation, i.e., the simultaneous allocation of resources such as processors and input files in multiple clusters. While such jobs may have reduced runtimes because they have access to more resources, waiting for processors in multiple clusters and for the input files to become available in the right locations may introduce inefficiencies. In previous work, we have studied through simulations only processor coallocation. Here, we extend this work with an analysis of the performance in a real testbed of our prototype processor and data coallocator with the close-to-files (CF) job-placement algorithm. CF tries to place job components on clusters with enough idle processors which are close to the sites where the input files reside. We present a comparison of the performance of CF and the worst-fit job-placement algorithm, with and without file replication, achieved with our prototype. Our most important findings are that CF with replication works best, and that the utilization in our testbed can be driven to about 80%.","PeriodicalId":123512,"journal":{"name":"2004 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX935)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"100","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the close-to-files processor and data co-allocation policy in multiclusters\",\"authors\":\"H. Mohamed, D. Epema\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLUSTR.2004.1392626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In multicluster systems, and more generally, in grids, jobs may require coallocation, i.e., the simultaneous allocation of resources such as processors and input files in multiple clusters. While such jobs may have reduced runtimes because they have access to more resources, waiting for processors in multiple clusters and for the input files to become available in the right locations may introduce inefficiencies. In previous work, we have studied through simulations only processor coallocation. Here, we extend this work with an analysis of the performance in a real testbed of our prototype processor and data coallocator with the close-to-files (CF) job-placement algorithm. CF tries to place job components on clusters with enough idle processors which are close to the sites where the input files reside. We present a comparison of the performance of CF and the worst-fit job-placement algorithm, with and without file replication, achieved with our prototype. Our most important findings are that CF with replication works best, and that the utilization in our testbed can be driven to about 80%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2004 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX935)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"100\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2004 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX935)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTR.2004.1392626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX935)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTR.2004.1392626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

摘要

在多集群系统中,更一般地说,在网格中,作业可能需要协同分配,即在多个集群中同时分配资源,如处理器和输入文件。虽然这样的作业可以减少运行时间,因为它们可以访问更多的资源,但是等待多个集群中的处理器和输入文件在正确的位置变得可用可能会导致效率低下。在以前的工作中,我们只通过仿真研究了处理器的共分配。在这里,我们扩展了这项工作,在一个真实的测试平台上分析了我们的原型处理器和数据整合器的性能,并使用了接近文件(CF)的工作分配算法。CF尝试将作业组件放置在具有足够空闲处理器的集群上,这些处理器靠近输入文件所在的站点。我们提出了CF和最坏的工作安置算法的性能比较,有和没有文件复制,实现了我们的原型。我们最重要的发现是带有复制的CF效果最好,并且我们的测试平台中的利用率可以达到80%左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of the close-to-files processor and data co-allocation policy in multiclusters
In multicluster systems, and more generally, in grids, jobs may require coallocation, i.e., the simultaneous allocation of resources such as processors and input files in multiple clusters. While such jobs may have reduced runtimes because they have access to more resources, waiting for processors in multiple clusters and for the input files to become available in the right locations may introduce inefficiencies. In previous work, we have studied through simulations only processor coallocation. Here, we extend this work with an analysis of the performance in a real testbed of our prototype processor and data coallocator with the close-to-files (CF) job-placement algorithm. CF tries to place job components on clusters with enough idle processors which are close to the sites where the input files reside. We present a comparison of the performance of CF and the worst-fit job-placement algorithm, with and without file replication, achieved with our prototype. Our most important findings are that CF with replication works best, and that the utilization in our testbed can be driven to about 80%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信