买卖土地权利中父母作为未成年亲生子女监护人的认定(浅析三宝垄宗教法院第396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg号案件的认定)

Setiyowati Setiyowati, Diana Ulfatun Khasanah
{"title":"买卖土地权利中父母作为未成年亲生子女监护人的认定(浅析三宝垄宗教法院第396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg号案件的认定)","authors":"Setiyowati Setiyowati, Diana Ulfatun Khasanah","doi":"10.56444/ulrev.v7i1.4105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 47 paragraph (1) Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that children who have not reached the age of 18 or have never been married, are under the authority of their parents as long as they are not deprived of their authority. However, what happened in the field was that many biological parents applied to the Semarang Religious Court for guardianship because they were asked by the PPAT on the grounds that it was the basis for making a Sale and Purchase Deed required by the National Land Agency (BPN), one of them in case number 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg. The formulation of the problem in this study: (1) What is the procedure for buying and selling land rights for minors? (2) Why does BPN require parents to be the guardians of biological children who are underage in buying and selling land rights? (3) What is the basis for the judge's considerations regarding the determination of parents as guardians of biological children who are still minors in the sale and purchase of land rights in case No. 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg? The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. The specifications in this study are analytical descriptive. Data is analyzed by way of Qualitative. The results of this study are (1) The procedure for transferring land rights owned by minors, namely the stages of the procedure in PPAT and the stages that must be fulfilled are permission to determine parental authority or determination of guardianship representing minors to the court. (2) The reason BPN requires the determination of parents is because it is the basis for making a sale and purchase deed and as legal evidence for the interests of the parties in the future. (3) The basis for the judge's consideration is that the assembly grants his request with consideration based on the principle of prudence and legal certainty","PeriodicalId":259996,"journal":{"name":"UNTAG Law Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETERMINATION OF PARENTS AS GUARDIANS OF BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN WHO ARE STILL MINORS IN THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF LAND RIGHTS (Analysis of the Determination of the Semarang Religious Court Case No. 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg)\",\"authors\":\"Setiyowati Setiyowati, Diana Ulfatun Khasanah\",\"doi\":\"10.56444/ulrev.v7i1.4105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 47 paragraph (1) Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that children who have not reached the age of 18 or have never been married, are under the authority of their parents as long as they are not deprived of their authority. However, what happened in the field was that many biological parents applied to the Semarang Religious Court for guardianship because they were asked by the PPAT on the grounds that it was the basis for making a Sale and Purchase Deed required by the National Land Agency (BPN), one of them in case number 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg. The formulation of the problem in this study: (1) What is the procedure for buying and selling land rights for minors? (2) Why does BPN require parents to be the guardians of biological children who are underage in buying and selling land rights? (3) What is the basis for the judge's considerations regarding the determination of parents as guardians of biological children who are still minors in the sale and purchase of land rights in case No. 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg? The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. The specifications in this study are analytical descriptive. Data is analyzed by way of Qualitative. The results of this study are (1) The procedure for transferring land rights owned by minors, namely the stages of the procedure in PPAT and the stages that must be fulfilled are permission to determine parental authority or determination of guardianship representing minors to the court. (2) The reason BPN requires the determination of parents is because it is the basis for making a sale and purchase deed and as legal evidence for the interests of the parties in the future. (3) The basis for the judge's consideration is that the assembly grants his request with consideration based on the principle of prudence and legal certainty\",\"PeriodicalId\":259996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNTAG Law Review\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNTAG Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56444/ulrev.v7i1.4105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNTAG Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56444/ulrev.v7i1.4105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第47条第(1)款。1974年关于婚姻的第1号法令规定,未满18岁或从未结婚的儿童,只要不被剥夺其父母的权威,就受其父母的管辖。然而,现场发生的情况是,许多亲生父母向三宝垄宗教法庭申请监护权,因为PPAT要求他们这样做,理由是这是国家土地局(BPN)要求的买卖契约的基础,其中一个案例是编号396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg。本研究问题的表述:(1)未成年人土地买卖权的程序是怎样的?(2)为什么BPN要求父母是未成年亲生子女的监护人?(3)在第396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg号案件中,法官在土地权利买卖中认定父母为未成年亲生子女的监护人的考虑依据是什么?本研究采用的研究方法是规范法学研究。本研究的规范是分析描述性的。数据采用定性分析的方法进行分析。本研究的结果是:(1)未成年人拥有的土地权利转让程序,即PPAT中的程序阶段,必须完成的阶段是允许确定父母授权或确定未成年人代表法院的监护权。(2) BPN之所以要求父母认定,是因为父母认定是买卖契约订立的依据,也是双方未来利益的法律依据。(3)法官考虑的基础是大会在审慎和法律确定性原则的基础上考虑批准他的请求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DETERMINATION OF PARENTS AS GUARDIANS OF BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN WHO ARE STILL MINORS IN THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF LAND RIGHTS (Analysis of the Determination of the Semarang Religious Court Case No. 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg)
Article 47 paragraph (1) Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that children who have not reached the age of 18 or have never been married, are under the authority of their parents as long as they are not deprived of their authority. However, what happened in the field was that many biological parents applied to the Semarang Religious Court for guardianship because they were asked by the PPAT on the grounds that it was the basis for making a Sale and Purchase Deed required by the National Land Agency (BPN), one of them in case number 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg. The formulation of the problem in this study: (1) What is the procedure for buying and selling land rights for minors? (2) Why does BPN require parents to be the guardians of biological children who are underage in buying and selling land rights? (3) What is the basis for the judge's considerations regarding the determination of parents as guardians of biological children who are still minors in the sale and purchase of land rights in case No. 396/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Smg? The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. The specifications in this study are analytical descriptive. Data is analyzed by way of Qualitative. The results of this study are (1) The procedure for transferring land rights owned by minors, namely the stages of the procedure in PPAT and the stages that must be fulfilled are permission to determine parental authority or determination of guardianship representing minors to the court. (2) The reason BPN requires the determination of parents is because it is the basis for making a sale and purchase deed and as legal evidence for the interests of the parties in the future. (3) The basis for the judge's consideration is that the assembly grants his request with consideration based on the principle of prudence and legal certainty
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信