基于HiBench的企业大数据平台性能评估

Todor Ivanov, Raik Niemann, Sead Izberovic, M. Rosselli, Karsten Tolle, R. Zicari
{"title":"基于HiBench的企业大数据平台性能评估","authors":"Todor Ivanov, Raik Niemann, Sead Izberovic, M. Rosselli, Karsten Tolle, R. Zicari","doi":"10.1109/Trustcom.2015.570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate the performance of DataStax Enterprise (DSE) using the HiBench benchmark suite and compare it with the corresponding Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop (CDH) results. Both systems, DSE and CDH were stress tested using CPU-bound (WordCount), I/O-bound (Enhanced DFSIO) and mixed (HiveBench) workloads. The experimental results showed that DSE is better than CDH in writing files, whereas CDH is better than DSE in reading files. Additionally, for DSE the read and write throughput difference is very minor, whereas for CDH the read throughput is much higher than the write throughput. The results we obtained show that the HiBench benchmark suite, developed specifically for Hadoop, can be successfully executed on top of the DataStax Enterprise (DSE).","PeriodicalId":277092,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Enterprise Big Data Platforms with HiBench\",\"authors\":\"Todor Ivanov, Raik Niemann, Sead Izberovic, M. Rosselli, Karsten Tolle, R. Zicari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Trustcom.2015.570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we evaluate the performance of DataStax Enterprise (DSE) using the HiBench benchmark suite and compare it with the corresponding Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop (CDH) results. Both systems, DSE and CDH were stress tested using CPU-bound (WordCount), I/O-bound (Enhanced DFSIO) and mixed (HiveBench) workloads. The experimental results showed that DSE is better than CDH in writing files, whereas CDH is better than DSE in reading files. Additionally, for DSE the read and write throughput difference is very minor, whereas for CDH the read throughput is much higher than the write throughput. The results we obtained show that the HiBench benchmark suite, developed specifically for Hadoop, can be successfully executed on top of the DataStax Enterprise (DSE).\",\"PeriodicalId\":277092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom.2015.570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom.2015.570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在本文中,我们使用HiBench基准套件评估了DataStax Enterprise (DSE)的性能,并将其与相应的Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop (CDH)结果进行了比较。两个系统,DSE和CDH都使用cpu绑定(WordCount), I/ o绑定(Enhanced DFSIO)和混合(HiveBench)工作负载进行了压力测试。实验结果表明,DSE在文件写入方面优于CDH,而CDH在文件读取方面优于DSE。此外,对于DSE,读吞吐量和写吞吐量的差异非常小,而对于CDH,读吞吐量远高于写吞吐量。我们获得的结果表明,专门为Hadoop开发的HiBench基准测试套件可以在DataStax Enterprise (DSE)之上成功执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of Enterprise Big Data Platforms with HiBench
In this paper, we evaluate the performance of DataStax Enterprise (DSE) using the HiBench benchmark suite and compare it with the corresponding Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop (CDH) results. Both systems, DSE and CDH were stress tested using CPU-bound (WordCount), I/O-bound (Enhanced DFSIO) and mixed (HiveBench) workloads. The experimental results showed that DSE is better than CDH in writing files, whereas CDH is better than DSE in reading files. Additionally, for DSE the read and write throughput difference is very minor, whereas for CDH the read throughput is much higher than the write throughput. The results we obtained show that the HiBench benchmark suite, developed specifically for Hadoop, can be successfully executed on top of the DataStax Enterprise (DSE).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信