一个分析组播树算法的仿真框架

Tawfig Alrabiah, T. Znati
{"title":"一个分析组播树算法的仿真框架","authors":"Tawfig Alrabiah, T. Znati","doi":"10.1109/SIMSYM.1997.586560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group communications in high speed networks require the development of efficient multicast algorithms. Finding the optimal multicast routing tree for a subset of a network nodes is an NP-complete problem known as the Steiner Minimal Tree (SMT). Several heuristics were developed to provide an approximate solutions for this problem. The analysis of these heuristics, however, have been limited to specific network topologies. This paper discusses a flexible simulation framework to study the performance of multicasting algorithms in different topologies, including dense and sparse networks. The framework is then used to provide a detailed analysis of the performance of a selected set of path distance heuristics frequently discussed in the literature. The performance of these heuristics as then compared to two new heuristics, namely Normalized Average Distance Heuristic (NADH) and Shared Average Distance Heuristic (SADH). The results show that, on average, NADH outperforms all other heuristics in dense network topologies. The results also show that SADH out-performs the selected set of path distance heuristics for most network topologies.","PeriodicalId":176748,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1997 SCS Simulation Multiconference","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simulation framework for the analysis of multicast tree algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Tawfig Alrabiah, T. Znati\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIMSYM.1997.586560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Group communications in high speed networks require the development of efficient multicast algorithms. Finding the optimal multicast routing tree for a subset of a network nodes is an NP-complete problem known as the Steiner Minimal Tree (SMT). Several heuristics were developed to provide an approximate solutions for this problem. The analysis of these heuristics, however, have been limited to specific network topologies. This paper discusses a flexible simulation framework to study the performance of multicasting algorithms in different topologies, including dense and sparse networks. The framework is then used to provide a detailed analysis of the performance of a selected set of path distance heuristics frequently discussed in the literature. The performance of these heuristics as then compared to two new heuristics, namely Normalized Average Distance Heuristic (NADH) and Shared Average Distance Heuristic (SADH). The results show that, on average, NADH outperforms all other heuristics in dense network topologies. The results also show that SADH out-performs the selected set of path distance heuristics for most network topologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1997 SCS Simulation Multiconference\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1997 SCS Simulation Multiconference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMSYM.1997.586560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1997 SCS Simulation Multiconference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMSYM.1997.586560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

高速网络中的组播通信要求开发高效的组播算法。寻找网络节点子集的最优组播路由树是一个np完全问题,称为Steiner最小树(SMT)。几个启发式的发展提供了一个近似的解决方案,为这个问题。然而,这些启发式的分析仅限于特定的网络拓扑结构。本文讨论了一种灵活的仿真框架来研究不同拓扑(包括密集网络和稀疏网络)下组播算法的性能。然后使用该框架对文献中经常讨论的一组路径距离启发式的性能进行详细分析。然后将这些启发式的性能与两种新的启发式进行比较,即归一化平均距离启发式(NADH)和共享平均距离启发式(SADH)。结果表明,平均而言,在密集网络拓扑中,NADH优于所有其他启发式算法。结果还表明,对于大多数网络拓扑,SADH优于路径距离启发式选择集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simulation framework for the analysis of multicast tree algorithms
Group communications in high speed networks require the development of efficient multicast algorithms. Finding the optimal multicast routing tree for a subset of a network nodes is an NP-complete problem known as the Steiner Minimal Tree (SMT). Several heuristics were developed to provide an approximate solutions for this problem. The analysis of these heuristics, however, have been limited to specific network topologies. This paper discusses a flexible simulation framework to study the performance of multicasting algorithms in different topologies, including dense and sparse networks. The framework is then used to provide a detailed analysis of the performance of a selected set of path distance heuristics frequently discussed in the literature. The performance of these heuristics as then compared to two new heuristics, namely Normalized Average Distance Heuristic (NADH) and Shared Average Distance Heuristic (SADH). The results show that, on average, NADH outperforms all other heuristics in dense network topologies. The results also show that SADH out-performs the selected set of path distance heuristics for most network topologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信