应该给新手和高级学生提供多少学习支持?

Xingliang Chen, A. Mitrovic, Moffat Mathews
{"title":"应该给新手和高级学生提供多少学习支持?","authors":"Xingliang Chen, A. Mitrovic, Moffat Mathews","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2017.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning from examples, either alone or combined with problem solving has been proven to be beneficial for learning in Intelligent Tutoring System. However, it is generally unknown how much example-based assistance should be provided. We previously found that erroneous examples prepared students better for problem solving in comparison to worked examples when the order of learning activities is fixed [2]. However, students do not necessarily need all learning activities. We introduced a novel strategy which adaptively decides which learning activity (a worked example, an incorrect example, a problem, or none at all) is appropriate for a student based on his/her performance in SQL-Tutor. In this paper, we investigate the effect of the adaptive strategy on students with different levels of prior knowledge. We found both novices and advanced students who received learning activities adaptively achieved the same learning outcomes as their peers in a fixed condition, but with fewer learning activities. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference on the number of learning activities between novices and advanced students.","PeriodicalId":134966,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Learning Support Should be Provided to Novices and Advanced Students?\",\"authors\":\"Xingliang Chen, A. Mitrovic, Moffat Mathews\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT.2017.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning from examples, either alone or combined with problem solving has been proven to be beneficial for learning in Intelligent Tutoring System. However, it is generally unknown how much example-based assistance should be provided. We previously found that erroneous examples prepared students better for problem solving in comparison to worked examples when the order of learning activities is fixed [2]. However, students do not necessarily need all learning activities. We introduced a novel strategy which adaptively decides which learning activity (a worked example, an incorrect example, a problem, or none at all) is appropriate for a student based on his/her performance in SQL-Tutor. In this paper, we investigate the effect of the adaptive strategy on students with different levels of prior knowledge. We found both novices and advanced students who received learning activities adaptively achieved the same learning outcomes as their peers in a fixed condition, but with fewer learning activities. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference on the number of learning activities between novices and advanced students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从实例中学习,无论是单独学习还是与问题解决相结合,都被证明对智能辅导系统的学习是有益的。但是,通常不知道应该提供多少基于实例的援助。我们之前发现,当学习活动的顺序固定时,错误的例子比正常的例子更能帮助学生解决问题[2]。然而,学生并不一定需要所有的学习活动。我们引入了一种新的策略,根据学生在SQL-Tutor中的表现,自适应地决定哪些学习活动(一个有效的例子,一个错误的例子,一个问题,或者根本没有)适合他/她。本研究探讨了适应策略对不同先验知识水平学生的影响。我们发现,接受适应性学习活动的初学者和高级学生在固定条件下取得了与同龄人相同的学习成果,但学习活动较少。令人惊讶的是,在学习活动的数量上,新手和高级学生之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Much Learning Support Should be Provided to Novices and Advanced Students?
Learning from examples, either alone or combined with problem solving has been proven to be beneficial for learning in Intelligent Tutoring System. However, it is generally unknown how much example-based assistance should be provided. We previously found that erroneous examples prepared students better for problem solving in comparison to worked examples when the order of learning activities is fixed [2]. However, students do not necessarily need all learning activities. We introduced a novel strategy which adaptively decides which learning activity (a worked example, an incorrect example, a problem, or none at all) is appropriate for a student based on his/her performance in SQL-Tutor. In this paper, we investigate the effect of the adaptive strategy on students with different levels of prior knowledge. We found both novices and advanced students who received learning activities adaptively achieved the same learning outcomes as their peers in a fixed condition, but with fewer learning activities. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference on the number of learning activities between novices and advanced students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信