技术生物学的主导力量。五、预防原则的必要性和局限性

Pierre de Puytorac
{"title":"技术生物学的主导力量。五、预防原则的必要性和局限性","authors":"Pierre de Puytorac","doi":"10.1016/S0003-5017(00)88930-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Almost all aspects of our life are now affected by progress in the technosciences. Together with the increasing association between sciences and money and with the direct intervention of technobiology practices into living mechanisms, this substantially increases the frequency and the gravity of hazards for the Human being, hence the emergence of the precaution principle. According to this principle, it can be justified or imperative to limit or even to stop certain actions that can be potentially dangerous i.e. long before the scientific certainty of the occurrence of the danger. From examples in relation with the case of blood contamination, with the regulation of atmospheric pollution, with the GMO, with the vaccination against hepatitis B or with the mad cow alert, and the “chicken gate” it is shown that the precaution principle would has been applied in some cases, has been applied in other cases and should be applied in some other cases. However, the precaution principle that can modify the intrinsic notion of resposibility, should not lead to the inaction. In front of the three powers (sciences, media, political), this principle needs the intervention of citizens considered in their cultural choices, a situation that, beforehand, implies the organisation of an adequate information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":78387,"journal":{"name":"L' Annee biologique","volume":"39 1","pages":"Pages 23-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-5017(00)88930-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le pouvoir de domination de la technobiologie. V. Nécessité et limites du principe de précaution\",\"authors\":\"Pierre de Puytorac\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0003-5017(00)88930-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Almost all aspects of our life are now affected by progress in the technosciences. Together with the increasing association between sciences and money and with the direct intervention of technobiology practices into living mechanisms, this substantially increases the frequency and the gravity of hazards for the Human being, hence the emergence of the precaution principle. According to this principle, it can be justified or imperative to limit or even to stop certain actions that can be potentially dangerous i.e. long before the scientific certainty of the occurrence of the danger. From examples in relation with the case of blood contamination, with the regulation of atmospheric pollution, with the GMO, with the vaccination against hepatitis B or with the mad cow alert, and the “chicken gate” it is shown that the precaution principle would has been applied in some cases, has been applied in other cases and should be applied in some other cases. However, the precaution principle that can modify the intrinsic notion of resposibility, should not lead to the inaction. In front of the three powers (sciences, media, political), this principle needs the intervention of citizens considered in their cultural choices, a situation that, beforehand, implies the organisation of an adequate information.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L' Annee biologique\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-5017(00)88930-8\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L' Annee biologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003501700889308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L' Annee biologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003501700889308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们生活的几乎所有方面都受到科技进步的影响。再加上科学与金钱之间的联系日益紧密,以及技术生物学实践对生命机制的直接干预,这大大增加了危害人类的频率和严重性,因此出现了预防原则。根据这一原则,限制甚至停止某些可能具有潜在危险的行为是合理的或势在必行的,即在科学确定危险发生之前很久。从与血液污染、大气污染管制、转基因生物、乙型肝炎疫苗接种或疯牛病警报和“鸡门”有关的案例中可以看出,预防原则在某些情况下已经适用,在其他情况下已经适用,在其他情况下应该适用。但是,预防原则可以修正内在的责任观念,不应导致不作为。在三大力量(科学、媒体、政治)面前,这一原则需要考虑到公民在其文化选择方面的干预,这种情况事先意味着组织足够的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Le pouvoir de domination de la technobiologie. V. Nécessité et limites du principe de précaution

Almost all aspects of our life are now affected by progress in the technosciences. Together with the increasing association between sciences and money and with the direct intervention of technobiology practices into living mechanisms, this substantially increases the frequency and the gravity of hazards for the Human being, hence the emergence of the precaution principle. According to this principle, it can be justified or imperative to limit or even to stop certain actions that can be potentially dangerous i.e. long before the scientific certainty of the occurrence of the danger. From examples in relation with the case of blood contamination, with the regulation of atmospheric pollution, with the GMO, with the vaccination against hepatitis B or with the mad cow alert, and the “chicken gate” it is shown that the precaution principle would has been applied in some cases, has been applied in other cases and should be applied in some other cases. However, the precaution principle that can modify the intrinsic notion of resposibility, should not lead to the inaction. In front of the three powers (sciences, media, political), this principle needs the intervention of citizens considered in their cultural choices, a situation that, beforehand, implies the organisation of an adequate information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信