约翰内斯堡证券交易所机构投资者粉饰账面:一个实证分析

N. Bhana
{"title":"约翰内斯堡证券交易所机构投资者粉饰账面:一个实证分析","authors":"N. Bhana","doi":"10.1080/10293523.1994.11082334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the widely held belief that institutional portfolio managers “window dress” or adjust their share portfolios before the release of their quarterly reports. In this study, block trading on the JSE covering the period 1983–1990 is examined to determine if there is abnormal end-of-period trading activity. The empirical evidence clearly rejects the null hypothesis of no abnormal end-of-period trading activity. While the company data yield less clear results, there are indications that institutional window dressing is more likely in the securities of companies that have performed poorly during the current quarter or the recent past. Although the behaviour of institutional portfolio managers cannot be generalized to other types of corporate activity, they suggest that reporting requirements do affect managerial behaviour.","PeriodicalId":126195,"journal":{"name":"The Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Window dressing by institutional investors on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: an empirical analysis\",\"authors\":\"N. Bhana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10293523.1994.11082334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the widely held belief that institutional portfolio managers “window dress” or adjust their share portfolios before the release of their quarterly reports. In this study, block trading on the JSE covering the period 1983–1990 is examined to determine if there is abnormal end-of-period trading activity. The empirical evidence clearly rejects the null hypothesis of no abnormal end-of-period trading activity. While the company data yield less clear results, there are indications that institutional window dressing is more likely in the securities of companies that have performed poorly during the current quarter or the recent past. Although the behaviour of institutional portfolio managers cannot be generalized to other types of corporate activity, they suggest that reporting requirements do affect managerial behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Investment Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Investment Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.1994.11082334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.1994.11082334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文的目的是调查机构投资组合经理在发布季度报告之前“粉饰”或调整其股票投资组合的普遍看法。在本研究中,对1983-1990年期间JSE的大宗交易进行了检查,以确定是否存在异常的期末交易活动。实证证据明显否定了无异常期末交易活动的零假设。虽然公司数据显示的结果不太明确,但有迹象表明,机构更有可能在本季度或最近一段时间表现不佳的公司的证券中进行粉饰。尽管机构投资组合经理的行为不能推广到其他类型的公司活动,但他们表明,报告要求确实影响管理行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Window dressing by institutional investors on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: an empirical analysis
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the widely held belief that institutional portfolio managers “window dress” or adjust their share portfolios before the release of their quarterly reports. In this study, block trading on the JSE covering the period 1983–1990 is examined to determine if there is abnormal end-of-period trading activity. The empirical evidence clearly rejects the null hypothesis of no abnormal end-of-period trading activity. While the company data yield less clear results, there are indications that institutional window dressing is more likely in the securities of companies that have performed poorly during the current quarter or the recent past. Although the behaviour of institutional portfolio managers cannot be generalized to other types of corporate activity, they suggest that reporting requirements do affect managerial behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信