反思性结构对话:基督教大学教师讨论LGBTQ+包容

H. Harris, Jeremy Counseller
{"title":"反思性结构对话:基督教大学教师讨论LGBTQ+包容","authors":"H. Harris, Jeremy Counseller","doi":"10.34043/swc.v49i1.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of LGBTQ+ inclusion is a challenging one in a number of Christian denominations and extends beyond congregations to religiously affiliated higher education. Are LGBTQ+ students free to be open and “out” in their colleges and universities that are affiliated with religious groups, particularly those whose beliefs may include that sexual orientation and gender identity are spiritual matters of sin, repentance, and change? This is a particular challenge to social work faculty in accredited programs whose commitment to social justice and diversity is central to their mission. In one university affiliated with traditionalist, conservative denominational groups, the administration reached out to social work and law faculty to facilitate university faculty discussions about inclusion. Faculty met using Reflective Structured Dialog (RSD) in focus groups to examine faculty views about how best to provide both a loving and supportive educational environment to LGBTQ+ students and honor the university’s mission and affiliations. The process was essential to gather and value very divergent points of view without fracturing the faculty. The authors provide context and process as a model for other universities exploring difficult value laden conversations in Christian contexts. \n \n \n ","PeriodicalId":159660,"journal":{"name":"Social Work & Christianity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflective Structured Dialogue: Faculty in a Christian University Discuss LGBTQ+ Inclusion\",\"authors\":\"H. Harris, Jeremy Counseller\",\"doi\":\"10.34043/swc.v49i1.253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of LGBTQ+ inclusion is a challenging one in a number of Christian denominations and extends beyond congregations to religiously affiliated higher education. Are LGBTQ+ students free to be open and “out” in their colleges and universities that are affiliated with religious groups, particularly those whose beliefs may include that sexual orientation and gender identity are spiritual matters of sin, repentance, and change? This is a particular challenge to social work faculty in accredited programs whose commitment to social justice and diversity is central to their mission. In one university affiliated with traditionalist, conservative denominational groups, the administration reached out to social work and law faculty to facilitate university faculty discussions about inclusion. Faculty met using Reflective Structured Dialog (RSD) in focus groups to examine faculty views about how best to provide both a loving and supportive educational environment to LGBTQ+ students and honor the university’s mission and affiliations. The process was essential to gather and value very divergent points of view without fracturing the faculty. The authors provide context and process as a model for other universities exploring difficult value laden conversations in Christian contexts. \\n \\n \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":159660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work & Christianity\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work & Christianity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34043/swc.v49i1.253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work & Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34043/swc.v49i1.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

LGBTQ+的包容性问题在许多基督教教派中都是一个具有挑战性的问题,并且从教会延伸到宗教附属的高等教育。LGBTQ+学生是否可以在与宗教团体有关联的学院和大学中自由地公开和“出柜”,特别是那些信仰可能包括性取向和性别认同是罪恶、悔改和改变的精神问题的大学?这对那些致力于社会公正和多样性的认证项目的社会工作教师来说是一个特别的挑战。在一所隶属于传统、保守教派团体的大学里,校方联系了社会工作和法律学院,以促进大学教师关于包容的讨论。教师们在焦点小组中使用反思性结构化对话(RSD)来讨论教师们对如何最好地为LGBTQ+学生提供一个充满爱和支持的教育环境,并尊重大学的使命和关系的看法。这个过程对于收集和评价非常不同的观点而不破坏教师是至关重要的。作者提供了背景和过程,作为其他大学在基督教背景下探索困难的价值观对话的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflective Structured Dialogue: Faculty in a Christian University Discuss LGBTQ+ Inclusion
The question of LGBTQ+ inclusion is a challenging one in a number of Christian denominations and extends beyond congregations to religiously affiliated higher education. Are LGBTQ+ students free to be open and “out” in their colleges and universities that are affiliated with religious groups, particularly those whose beliefs may include that sexual orientation and gender identity are spiritual matters of sin, repentance, and change? This is a particular challenge to social work faculty in accredited programs whose commitment to social justice and diversity is central to their mission. In one university affiliated with traditionalist, conservative denominational groups, the administration reached out to social work and law faculty to facilitate university faculty discussions about inclusion. Faculty met using Reflective Structured Dialog (RSD) in focus groups to examine faculty views about how best to provide both a loving and supportive educational environment to LGBTQ+ students and honor the university’s mission and affiliations. The process was essential to gather and value very divergent points of view without fracturing the faculty. The authors provide context and process as a model for other universities exploring difficult value laden conversations in Christian contexts.      
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信