数字指定案例特征的概念距离

W. Dubitzky, A. Schuster, J. Hughes, D. Bell
{"title":"数字指定案例特征的概念距离","authors":"W. Dubitzky, A. Schuster, J. Hughes, D. Bell","doi":"10.1109/ANNES.1995.499473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case-based reasoning (CBR) systems rely on the conceptual ordering of entities called cases. If atomic case features are allowed to assume numeric as well as symbolic values, then a systematic comparison regime is needed to aggregate similarity scores. A common approach to deal with real-numbered features is normalisation. However, there are two conspicuous problems with this procedure: the similarity between two features is dependent on the corresponding values of all other cases to be ranked; and real-numbered features are often interpreted by human experts according to conceptual constraints associated with features. In such situations, a conceptual distance between two features should be determined rather than the length of a 'gap' on a linear scale. Within the framework of a comprehensive case-knowledge architecture, the notion of a concept frame that can be associated with a case feature is proposed. Through this component it is possible to represent polymorphic atomic case features, and to systematically establish the concept distance between two real-numbered feature instances.","PeriodicalId":123427,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1995 Second New Zealand International Two-Stream Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual distance of numerically specified case features\",\"authors\":\"W. Dubitzky, A. Schuster, J. Hughes, D. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ANNES.1995.499473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case-based reasoning (CBR) systems rely on the conceptual ordering of entities called cases. If atomic case features are allowed to assume numeric as well as symbolic values, then a systematic comparison regime is needed to aggregate similarity scores. A common approach to deal with real-numbered features is normalisation. However, there are two conspicuous problems with this procedure: the similarity between two features is dependent on the corresponding values of all other cases to be ranked; and real-numbered features are often interpreted by human experts according to conceptual constraints associated with features. In such situations, a conceptual distance between two features should be determined rather than the length of a 'gap' on a linear scale. Within the framework of a comprehensive case-knowledge architecture, the notion of a concept frame that can be associated with a case feature is proposed. Through this component it is possible to represent polymorphic atomic case features, and to systematically establish the concept distance between two real-numbered feature instances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1995 Second New Zealand International Two-Stream Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1995 Second New Zealand International Two-Stream Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANNES.1995.499473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1995 Second New Zealand International Two-Stream Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANNES.1995.499473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

基于案例的推理(CBR)系统依赖于称为案例的实体的概念排序。如果允许原子情况特征假设数字和符号值,那么就需要一个系统的比较机制来汇总相似性分数。处理实数特征的常用方法是规范化。然而,这个过程有两个明显的问题:两个特征之间的相似性依赖于所有其他待排序情况的对应值;实数特征通常由人类专家根据与特征相关的概念约束来解释。在这种情况下,应该确定两个特征之间的概念距离,而不是线性尺度上的“间隙”长度。在综合案例知识体系结构的框架内,提出了与案例特征相关联的概念框架的概念。通过该组件可以表示多态原子案例特征,并系统地建立两个实数特征实例之间的概念距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual distance of numerically specified case features
Case-based reasoning (CBR) systems rely on the conceptual ordering of entities called cases. If atomic case features are allowed to assume numeric as well as symbolic values, then a systematic comparison regime is needed to aggregate similarity scores. A common approach to deal with real-numbered features is normalisation. However, there are two conspicuous problems with this procedure: the similarity between two features is dependent on the corresponding values of all other cases to be ranked; and real-numbered features are often interpreted by human experts according to conceptual constraints associated with features. In such situations, a conceptual distance between two features should be determined rather than the length of a 'gap' on a linear scale. Within the framework of a comprehensive case-knowledge architecture, the notion of a concept frame that can be associated with a case feature is proposed. Through this component it is possible to represent polymorphic atomic case features, and to systematically establish the concept distance between two real-numbered feature instances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信