“倒垃圾”:为什么安全行为的改变需要有意识的遗忘

Jonas Hielscher, A. Kluge, Uta Menges, M. Sasse
{"title":"“倒垃圾”:为什么安全行为的改变需要有意识的遗忘","authors":"Jonas Hielscher, A. Kluge, Uta Menges, M. Sasse","doi":"10.1145/3498891.3498902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security awareness is big business – virtually every organization in the Western world provides some form of awareness or training, mostly bought from external vendors. However, studies and industry reports show that these programs have little to no effect in terms of changing the security behavior of employees. We explain the conditions that enable behavior change, and identify one significant blocker in the implementation phase: not disabling existing (insecure) routines – failure to take out the trash – prevents embedding of new (secure) routines. Organizational Psychology offers the paradigm Intentional Forgetting (IF) and associated tools for replacing old (insecure) behaviors with new (secure) ones by identifying and eliminating different cues (sensoric, routine-based, time and space based as well as situational strength cues) that trigger old behavior. We introduce the underlying theory, examples of successful application in safety contexts, and show how its application leads to effective behavior change by reducing the information that needs to be transmitted to employees, and suppressing obsolete routines.","PeriodicalId":320273,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 New Security Paradigms Workshop","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Taking out the Trash”: Why Security Behavior Change requires Intentional Forgetting\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Hielscher, A. Kluge, Uta Menges, M. Sasse\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3498891.3498902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Security awareness is big business – virtually every organization in the Western world provides some form of awareness or training, mostly bought from external vendors. However, studies and industry reports show that these programs have little to no effect in terms of changing the security behavior of employees. We explain the conditions that enable behavior change, and identify one significant blocker in the implementation phase: not disabling existing (insecure) routines – failure to take out the trash – prevents embedding of new (secure) routines. Organizational Psychology offers the paradigm Intentional Forgetting (IF) and associated tools for replacing old (insecure) behaviors with new (secure) ones by identifying and eliminating different cues (sensoric, routine-based, time and space based as well as situational strength cues) that trigger old behavior. We introduce the underlying theory, examples of successful application in safety contexts, and show how its application leads to effective behavior change by reducing the information that needs to be transmitted to employees, and suppressing obsolete routines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 New Security Paradigms Workshop\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 New Security Paradigms Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3498891.3498902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 New Security Paradigms Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3498891.3498902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

安全意识是一项大业务——实际上,西方世界的每个组织都提供某种形式的安全意识或培训,大部分是从外部供应商那里购买的。然而,研究和行业报告表明,这些计划在改变员工的安全行为方面几乎没有效果。我们解释了导致行为改变的条件,并确定了实现阶段的一个重要障碍:不禁用现有的(不安全的)例程——无法取出垃圾——会阻止嵌入新的(安全的)例程。组织心理学提供了故意遗忘(IF)范式和相关工具,通过识别和消除触发旧行为的不同线索(感官、常规、时间和空间以及情境力量线索),用新的(安全的)行为取代旧的(不安全的)行为。我们介绍了基本理论,在安全环境中成功应用的例子,并展示了它的应用如何通过减少需要传递给员工的信息和抑制过时的惯例来导致有效的行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Taking out the Trash”: Why Security Behavior Change requires Intentional Forgetting
Security awareness is big business – virtually every organization in the Western world provides some form of awareness or training, mostly bought from external vendors. However, studies and industry reports show that these programs have little to no effect in terms of changing the security behavior of employees. We explain the conditions that enable behavior change, and identify one significant blocker in the implementation phase: not disabling existing (insecure) routines – failure to take out the trash – prevents embedding of new (secure) routines. Organizational Psychology offers the paradigm Intentional Forgetting (IF) and associated tools for replacing old (insecure) behaviors with new (secure) ones by identifying and eliminating different cues (sensoric, routine-based, time and space based as well as situational strength cues) that trigger old behavior. We introduce the underlying theory, examples of successful application in safety contexts, and show how its application leads to effective behavior change by reducing the information that needs to be transmitted to employees, and suppressing obsolete routines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信