对话在南非有意义的课堂互动中的作用

Dr Kellie Steinke, Prof Rosemary Wildsmith-Cromarty
{"title":"对话在南非有意义的课堂互动中的作用","authors":"Dr Kellie Steinke, Prof Rosemary Wildsmith-Cromarty","doi":"10.33422/worldte.v1i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of meaningful classroom dialogue in the foundation and early intermediate levels of education in creating effective literacy skills is well documented.  Despite comments in a recent paper that there is a dearth of research on classroom observations around print in South Africa since 1994 at foundation level, there have actually been several studies that have observed classroom practice in this area post-1994. This paper discusses three particularly important ones that spanned some three decades in South Africa and observed the role and practice of dialogue in classroom teaching around text at foundation and early intermediate schooling levels.  All three studies indicate that teaching styles have changed very little to date, and that meaningful classroom interaction between teacher and learner remains largely absent.  The Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of the participating teachers continues to restrict student agency in the area of classroom interaction.  Although each of the researchers captured the evidence in different ways, they all came to the same conclusion: that all teachers are still teaching restrictively and do not ask the type of open, extended questions necessary to engage in dialogue which helps develop critical thinking or the vocabulary necessary to develop effective literacy skills in learners.","PeriodicalId":288175,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The World Conference on Research in Teaching and Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of dialogue in meaningful classroom interaction in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Dr Kellie Steinke, Prof Rosemary Wildsmith-Cromarty\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/worldte.v1i1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of meaningful classroom dialogue in the foundation and early intermediate levels of education in creating effective literacy skills is well documented.  Despite comments in a recent paper that there is a dearth of research on classroom observations around print in South Africa since 1994 at foundation level, there have actually been several studies that have observed classroom practice in this area post-1994. This paper discusses three particularly important ones that spanned some three decades in South Africa and observed the role and practice of dialogue in classroom teaching around text at foundation and early intermediate schooling levels.  All three studies indicate that teaching styles have changed very little to date, and that meaningful classroom interaction between teacher and learner remains largely absent.  The Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of the participating teachers continues to restrict student agency in the area of classroom interaction.  Although each of the researchers captured the evidence in different ways, they all came to the same conclusion: that all teachers are still teaching restrictively and do not ask the type of open, extended questions necessary to engage in dialogue which helps develop critical thinking or the vocabulary necessary to develop effective literacy skills in learners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The World Conference on Research in Teaching and Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The World Conference on Research in Teaching and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/worldte.v1i1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The World Conference on Research in Teaching and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/worldte.v1i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在基础教育和早期中级教育中,有意义的课堂对话对于培养有效的读写技能的重要性是有据可查的。尽管最近的一篇论文评论说,1994年以来,在南非的基础水平上,缺乏关于印刷课堂观察的研究,但实际上已经有几项研究观察了1994年后这一领域的课堂实践。本文讨论了三十年来在南非发生的三个特别重要的事件,并观察了对话在基础和早期中等教育阶段围绕文本的课堂教学中的作用和实践。这三项研究都表明,到目前为止,教学风格几乎没有改变,教师和学习者之间有意义的课堂互动在很大程度上仍然缺失。参与教师的教学内容知识(PCK)继续限制学生在课堂互动领域的能动性。尽管每一位研究人员都以不同的方式捕捉到证据,但他们都得出了相同的结论:所有的教师仍然在严格地进行教学,没有提出开放式的、延伸的问题,而这些问题是进行对话所必需的,而对话有助于培养批判性思维,也没有提出培养学习者有效读写技能所必需的词汇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of dialogue in meaningful classroom interaction in South Africa
The importance of meaningful classroom dialogue in the foundation and early intermediate levels of education in creating effective literacy skills is well documented.  Despite comments in a recent paper that there is a dearth of research on classroom observations around print in South Africa since 1994 at foundation level, there have actually been several studies that have observed classroom practice in this area post-1994. This paper discusses three particularly important ones that spanned some three decades in South Africa and observed the role and practice of dialogue in classroom teaching around text at foundation and early intermediate schooling levels.  All three studies indicate that teaching styles have changed very little to date, and that meaningful classroom interaction between teacher and learner remains largely absent.  The Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of the participating teachers continues to restrict student agency in the area of classroom interaction.  Although each of the researchers captured the evidence in different ways, they all came to the same conclusion: that all teachers are still teaching restrictively and do not ask the type of open, extended questions necessary to engage in dialogue which helps develop critical thinking or the vocabulary necessary to develop effective literacy skills in learners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信