党派回报差距:大流行时期的两极分化股市

Jinfei Sheng, Zheng Sun, Wanyi Wang
{"title":"党派回报差距:大流行时期的两极分化股市","authors":"Jinfei Sheng, Zheng Sun, Wanyi Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3809575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using two proxies for investors’ political affiliation, we document sharp differences in stock returns between firms likely dominated by Democratic investors (blue stocks) and those dominated by Republican investors (red stocks) during the COVID pandemic. Red stocks have 20 basis points higher risk-adjusted returns than blue stocks on COVID news days (Partisan Return Gap). Lockdown policies, COVID cases, industry and firm fundamentals only explain at most 40% of the return gap. Polarized political beliefs about COVID, revealed through people’s social distancing behavior, contribute to about 40% of the return gap beyond the fundamental channel. Our paper provides partisanship as a novel aspect in understanding abnormal stock returns during the pandemic. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Supplemental Material: The data and e-companion are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4913 .","PeriodicalId":260048,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partisan Return Gap: The Polarized Stock Market in the Time of a Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Jinfei Sheng, Zheng Sun, Wanyi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3809575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using two proxies for investors’ political affiliation, we document sharp differences in stock returns between firms likely dominated by Democratic investors (blue stocks) and those dominated by Republican investors (red stocks) during the COVID pandemic. Red stocks have 20 basis points higher risk-adjusted returns than blue stocks on COVID news days (Partisan Return Gap). Lockdown policies, COVID cases, industry and firm fundamentals only explain at most 40% of the return gap. Polarized political beliefs about COVID, revealed through people’s social distancing behavior, contribute to about 40% of the return gap beyond the fundamental channel. Our paper provides partisanship as a novel aspect in understanding abnormal stock returns during the pandemic. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Supplemental Material: The data and e-companion are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4913 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":260048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

使用投资者政治派别的两个代理,我们记录了在COVID大流行期间,可能由民主党投资者主导的公司(蓝色股票)和由共和党投资者主导的公司(红色股票)之间的股票回报存在巨大差异。在新冠疫情爆发当天,红色股票的风险调整收益率比蓝色股票高出20个基点(党派收益差距)。封锁政策、新冠疫情、行业和坚实的基本面最多只能解释40%的回报差距。在基本渠道之外的回报差距中,约40%是通过人们的社会距离行为表现出来的两极分化的政治观念造成的。本文将党派关系作为理解大流行期间股票异常收益的一个新方面。这篇论文被卢卡斯·施密德接受了。补充材料:数据和电子伴侣可在https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4913上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partisan Return Gap: The Polarized Stock Market in the Time of a Pandemic
Using two proxies for investors’ political affiliation, we document sharp differences in stock returns between firms likely dominated by Democratic investors (blue stocks) and those dominated by Republican investors (red stocks) during the COVID pandemic. Red stocks have 20 basis points higher risk-adjusted returns than blue stocks on COVID news days (Partisan Return Gap). Lockdown policies, COVID cases, industry and firm fundamentals only explain at most 40% of the return gap. Polarized political beliefs about COVID, revealed through people’s social distancing behavior, contribute to about 40% of the return gap beyond the fundamental channel. Our paper provides partisanship as a novel aspect in understanding abnormal stock returns during the pandemic. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Supplemental Material: The data and e-companion are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4913 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信