编者按:思维的从众效应与多元文化互动

F. Obiakor, B. Algozzine
{"title":"编者按:思维的从众效应与多元文化互动","authors":"F. Obiakor, B. Algozzine","doi":"10.1515/MLT-2018-2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are frequent emotional outbursts throughout our communities today that sometimes lack serious thought-provoking solutions that can bring people together. To a large measure, these rants reflect the “bandwagon effect” on thinking that influences our multicultural interactions. While thinking is a powerful human endeavor; it can have “negative” or “positive” influence on individuals and groups. When thinking is used inappropriately or not used at all, human-beings and societies suffer. It is impossible to address the vexing problems faced in communities, regions, states, nations, and the world without progressive and constructive thinking. In the same dimension, when thinking is interwoven with education as it should, people grow, experience, experiment, do, act, discover, create, and invent. For example, in great democratic nations such as Canada, France, Germany, and the United States, leaders are democratically elected and education is framed to reflect the ability to grow via the freedom to think or “question and answer.” In communist, socialist, and dictatorial governments such as Russia, China, and North Korea, leaders serve for longer terms and frequently enjoy imposed power that is forced on the people and education fails to encourage the “question and answer” method. Is it any surprise that in democracies, citizens think their ways into a pattern of living; and in communist, socialist, and dictatorial governments, people live their ways into a system of thinking? As noted, thinking and education go hand-in-glove. Education, in this context, does not only mean having the most powerful degrees from the most powerful colleges/universities; it contextually means that constructive education enhances democratic thinking that is connected to making functional goal-directed decisions. From our perspective, we believe thinking people are open to learning, experimenting, experiencing, exploring, and discovering. These are actionable behaviors that are embedded in good educational environments where the human mind is hungry or allowed to grow and expand to renew itself. In addition, we believe educational renewal leads to societal renewal, and vice versa. In his perspective on what true education, John Dewey (1897) argued that:","PeriodicalId":133504,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Learning and Teaching","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors’ Comments: The Bandwagon Effect on Thinking and Multicultural Interaction\",\"authors\":\"F. Obiakor, B. Algozzine\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/MLT-2018-2001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are frequent emotional outbursts throughout our communities today that sometimes lack serious thought-provoking solutions that can bring people together. To a large measure, these rants reflect the “bandwagon effect” on thinking that influences our multicultural interactions. While thinking is a powerful human endeavor; it can have “negative” or “positive” influence on individuals and groups. When thinking is used inappropriately or not used at all, human-beings and societies suffer. It is impossible to address the vexing problems faced in communities, regions, states, nations, and the world without progressive and constructive thinking. In the same dimension, when thinking is interwoven with education as it should, people grow, experience, experiment, do, act, discover, create, and invent. For example, in great democratic nations such as Canada, France, Germany, and the United States, leaders are democratically elected and education is framed to reflect the ability to grow via the freedom to think or “question and answer.” In communist, socialist, and dictatorial governments such as Russia, China, and North Korea, leaders serve for longer terms and frequently enjoy imposed power that is forced on the people and education fails to encourage the “question and answer” method. Is it any surprise that in democracies, citizens think their ways into a pattern of living; and in communist, socialist, and dictatorial governments, people live their ways into a system of thinking? As noted, thinking and education go hand-in-glove. Education, in this context, does not only mean having the most powerful degrees from the most powerful colleges/universities; it contextually means that constructive education enhances democratic thinking that is connected to making functional goal-directed decisions. From our perspective, we believe thinking people are open to learning, experimenting, experiencing, exploring, and discovering. These are actionable behaviors that are embedded in good educational environments where the human mind is hungry or allowed to grow and expand to renew itself. In addition, we believe educational renewal leads to societal renewal, and vice versa. In his perspective on what true education, John Dewey (1897) argued that:\",\"PeriodicalId\":133504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multicultural Learning and Teaching\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multicultural Learning and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/MLT-2018-2001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/MLT-2018-2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

今天,在我们的社区中,经常有情绪爆发,有时缺乏严肃的发人深省的解决方案,可以让人们团结起来。在很大程度上,这些咆哮反映了影响我们多元文化互动的思维的“从众效应”。思考是人类的一种强大的努力;它可以对个人和群体产生“消极”或“积极”的影响。当思维被不恰当地使用或根本不被使用时,人类和社会都会受到影响。没有进步和建设性的思考,就不可能解决社区、地区、国家、民族和世界面临的棘手问题。在同一维度上,当思考与教育交织在一起时,人们成长、体验、实验、实践、行动、发现、创造和发明。例如,在加拿大、法国、德国和美国等民主大国,领导人是民主选举产生的,教育的框架反映了通过自由思考或“提问与回答”而成长的能力。在共产主义、社会主义和独裁政府中,如俄罗斯、中国和朝鲜,领导人的任期更长,经常享受强加给人民的权力,教育也未能鼓励“问答”方法。在民主国家,公民通过思考进入一种生活模式,这不足为奇;在共产主义、社会主义和独裁政府中,人们按照自己的方式生活,形成一种思维体系?如前所述,思考和教育是密不可分的。在这种情况下,教育不仅意味着从最有影响力的学院/大学获得最有影响力的学位;它在语境中意味着建设性教育增强了与做出功能性目标导向决策相关的民主思维。从我们的角度来看,我们相信有思想的人乐于学习、实验、体验、探索和发现。这些都是可操作的行为,嵌入在良好的教育环境中,在那里人类的思想是饥饿的,或者被允许生长和扩展以自我更新。此外,我们相信教育的更新会导致社会的更新,反之亦然。约翰·杜威(1897)在他关于什么是真正的教育的观点中认为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editors’ Comments: The Bandwagon Effect on Thinking and Multicultural Interaction
There are frequent emotional outbursts throughout our communities today that sometimes lack serious thought-provoking solutions that can bring people together. To a large measure, these rants reflect the “bandwagon effect” on thinking that influences our multicultural interactions. While thinking is a powerful human endeavor; it can have “negative” or “positive” influence on individuals and groups. When thinking is used inappropriately or not used at all, human-beings and societies suffer. It is impossible to address the vexing problems faced in communities, regions, states, nations, and the world without progressive and constructive thinking. In the same dimension, when thinking is interwoven with education as it should, people grow, experience, experiment, do, act, discover, create, and invent. For example, in great democratic nations such as Canada, France, Germany, and the United States, leaders are democratically elected and education is framed to reflect the ability to grow via the freedom to think or “question and answer.” In communist, socialist, and dictatorial governments such as Russia, China, and North Korea, leaders serve for longer terms and frequently enjoy imposed power that is forced on the people and education fails to encourage the “question and answer” method. Is it any surprise that in democracies, citizens think their ways into a pattern of living; and in communist, socialist, and dictatorial governments, people live their ways into a system of thinking? As noted, thinking and education go hand-in-glove. Education, in this context, does not only mean having the most powerful degrees from the most powerful colleges/universities; it contextually means that constructive education enhances democratic thinking that is connected to making functional goal-directed decisions. From our perspective, we believe thinking people are open to learning, experimenting, experiencing, exploring, and discovering. These are actionable behaviors that are embedded in good educational environments where the human mind is hungry or allowed to grow and expand to renew itself. In addition, we believe educational renewal leads to societal renewal, and vice versa. In his perspective on what true education, John Dewey (1897) argued that:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信