{"title":"不同方法得到的非对称模态滤波器时间响应的比较","authors":"Z. Kenzhegulova, R. Surovtsev, R. Khazhibekov","doi":"10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-53-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of comparing the time responses at the end of the asymmetric MF obtained by different approaches are presented. For this purpose, time responses were obtained by analytical, quasi-static and electrodynamic approaches, as well as by measurements. When compared with the results of the quasistatic approach, almost complete coincidence of responses was revealed (within 2%). The maximum deviation when compared with the results of the electrodynamic approach was 8% in amplitude and 29% in the delay of the decomposition pulses. A comparison of the results obtained analytically and using measurements of the MF layout revealed deviations in amplitude of 21% for the first and 8.7% for the second pulses, respectively, and 2.2 and 3.9% for their delays.","PeriodicalId":273068,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of time responses of an asymmetric modal filter obtained in different ways\",\"authors\":\"Z. Kenzhegulova, R. Surovtsev, R. Khazhibekov\",\"doi\":\"10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-53-58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of comparing the time responses at the end of the asymmetric MF obtained by different approaches are presented. For this purpose, time responses were obtained by analytical, quasi-static and electrodynamic approaches, as well as by measurements. When compared with the results of the quasistatic approach, almost complete coincidence of responses was revealed (within 2%). The maximum deviation when compared with the results of the electrodynamic approach was 8% in amplitude and 29% in the delay of the decomposition pulses. A comparison of the results obtained analytically and using measurements of the MF layout revealed deviations in amplitude of 21% for the first and 8.7% for the second pulses, respectively, and 2.2 and 3.9% for their delays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-53-58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-53-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of time responses of an asymmetric modal filter obtained in different ways
The results of comparing the time responses at the end of the asymmetric MF obtained by different approaches are presented. For this purpose, time responses were obtained by analytical, quasi-static and electrodynamic approaches, as well as by measurements. When compared with the results of the quasistatic approach, almost complete coincidence of responses was revealed (within 2%). The maximum deviation when compared with the results of the electrodynamic approach was 8% in amplitude and 29% in the delay of the decomposition pulses. A comparison of the results obtained analytically and using measurements of the MF layout revealed deviations in amplitude of 21% for the first and 8.7% for the second pulses, respectively, and 2.2 and 3.9% for their delays.