{"title":"定义平等主义的崇高","authors":"James Williams","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter gives a detailed definition of the egalitarian sublime. It distinguishes this anarchic definition from Rancière’s political philosophy while taking inspiration from Balibar’s work. The chapter claims that the sublime is always at risk of leading to inequalities. The chapter finishes by repudiating the idea that we can arrive at a state free of the sublime. This involves a critical reading of the shift from the sublime to wonder in Genevieve Lloyd’s philosophy.","PeriodicalId":328301,"journal":{"name":"The Egalitarian Sublime","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the Egalitarian Sublime\",\"authors\":\"James Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter gives a detailed definition of the egalitarian sublime. It distinguishes this anarchic definition from Rancière’s political philosophy while taking inspiration from Balibar’s work. The chapter claims that the sublime is always at risk of leading to inequalities. The chapter finishes by repudiating the idea that we can arrive at a state free of the sublime. This involves a critical reading of the shift from the sublime to wonder in Genevieve Lloyd’s philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egalitarian Sublime\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egalitarian Sublime\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egalitarian Sublime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter gives a detailed definition of the egalitarian sublime. It distinguishes this anarchic definition from Rancière’s political philosophy while taking inspiration from Balibar’s work. The chapter claims that the sublime is always at risk of leading to inequalities. The chapter finishes by repudiating the idea that we can arrive at a state free of the sublime. This involves a critical reading of the shift from the sublime to wonder in Genevieve Lloyd’s philosophy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
