俄罗斯刑事诉讼上诉程序现代化的前景:国外经验分析

A. Nazarov, A. Trofimik
{"title":"俄罗斯刑事诉讼上诉程序现代化的前景:国外经验分析","authors":"A. Nazarov, A. Trofimik","doi":"10.18287/2542-047x-2023-9-1-28-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article researches the problem of presenting new evidence on appeal. Part 6.1 of Article 389.13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation is analyzed. A comparison is made between Russian and German procedures and conditions for the presentation of new evidence to ensure a high standard of administration of justice in criminal cases. The characteristic features of the German criminal appeal are singled out and described, which can become a guideline for improving Russian proceedings in the courts of appeal. In view of the foregoing, the purpose of this study is to establish the essential features of foreign legal order in the indicated respect and to assess the possibility of formulating conclusions and proposals aimed at improving the domestic model of the criminal process based on the legislative and doctrinal experience of the related legal order. In this regard, at this stage, the main task is a systematic analysis of the appellate proceedings in Germany through the prism of legislation, doctrine and practice of law enforcement and, on this basis, an assessment of the domestic model of appeal in criminal proceedings. Due to the specifics of the study, the methodological basis is the comparative legal method in all its variety of manifestations as a complex methodological system. The study substantiates the ideas of a full-fledged appeal and the need for unconditional (free) presentation of new evidence in the Russian appeal. The result of the study and analysis were proposals for the modernization of criminal procedure law: the procedure for presenting new evidence in an appeal should be simplified.","PeriodicalId":406056,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospects for modernization of appeal proceedings in Russian criminal procedure: analysis of foreign experience\",\"authors\":\"A. Nazarov, A. Trofimik\",\"doi\":\"10.18287/2542-047x-2023-9-1-28-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article researches the problem of presenting new evidence on appeal. Part 6.1 of Article 389.13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation is analyzed. A comparison is made between Russian and German procedures and conditions for the presentation of new evidence to ensure a high standard of administration of justice in criminal cases. The characteristic features of the German criminal appeal are singled out and described, which can become a guideline for improving Russian proceedings in the courts of appeal. In view of the foregoing, the purpose of this study is to establish the essential features of foreign legal order in the indicated respect and to assess the possibility of formulating conclusions and proposals aimed at improving the domestic model of the criminal process based on the legislative and doctrinal experience of the related legal order. In this regard, at this stage, the main task is a systematic analysis of the appellate proceedings in Germany through the prism of legislation, doctrine and practice of law enforcement and, on this basis, an assessment of the domestic model of appeal in criminal proceedings. Due to the specifics of the study, the methodological basis is the comparative legal method in all its variety of manifestations as a complex methodological system. The study substantiates the ideas of a full-fledged appeal and the need for unconditional (free) presentation of new evidence in the Russian appeal. The result of the study and analysis were proposals for the modernization of criminal procedure law: the procedure for presenting new evidence in an appeal should be simplified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Journal of Samara University\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Journal of Samara University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2023-9-1-28-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2023-9-1-28-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对上诉中提出新证据的问题进行了研究。对《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第389.13条第6.1部分进行了分析。对俄罗斯和德国提出新证据的程序和条件进行了比较,以确保在刑事案件中有高标准的司法行政。本文对德国刑事上诉的特点进行了分析和描述,为改进俄罗斯上诉法院的诉讼程序提供了指导。鉴于上述情况,本研究的目的是确定外国法律秩序在上述方面的基本特征,并评估是否有可能根据有关法律秩序的立法和理论经验拟订结论和建议,以改进国内刑事程序模式。在这方面,本阶段的主要任务是通过立法、理论和执法实践的棱镜系统地分析德国的上诉程序,并在此基础上评估国内刑事诉讼中的上诉模式。由于研究的特殊性,其方法论基础是比较法作为一个复杂的方法论体系的各种表现形式。这项研究证实了提出全面上诉的想法以及在俄罗斯上诉中无条件(自由)提出新证据的必要性。研究和分析的结果是关于刑事诉讼法现代化的建议:应简化在上诉中提出新证据的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospects for modernization of appeal proceedings in Russian criminal procedure: analysis of foreign experience
The article researches the problem of presenting new evidence on appeal. Part 6.1 of Article 389.13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation is analyzed. A comparison is made between Russian and German procedures and conditions for the presentation of new evidence to ensure a high standard of administration of justice in criminal cases. The characteristic features of the German criminal appeal are singled out and described, which can become a guideline for improving Russian proceedings in the courts of appeal. In view of the foregoing, the purpose of this study is to establish the essential features of foreign legal order in the indicated respect and to assess the possibility of formulating conclusions and proposals aimed at improving the domestic model of the criminal process based on the legislative and doctrinal experience of the related legal order. In this regard, at this stage, the main task is a systematic analysis of the appellate proceedings in Germany through the prism of legislation, doctrine and practice of law enforcement and, on this basis, an assessment of the domestic model of appeal in criminal proceedings. Due to the specifics of the study, the methodological basis is the comparative legal method in all its variety of manifestations as a complex methodological system. The study substantiates the ideas of a full-fledged appeal and the need for unconditional (free) presentation of new evidence in the Russian appeal. The result of the study and analysis were proposals for the modernization of criminal procedure law: the procedure for presenting new evidence in an appeal should be simplified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信