互联网对政党的正常化与均等化效应:以2015年新加坡大选为例

Tarn How Tan, Ying Hui Tng, Andrew Yeo
{"title":"互联网对政党的正常化与均等化效应:以2015年新加坡大选为例","authors":"Tarn How Tan, Ying Hui Tng, Andrew Yeo","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the equalization theory, new media levels the electoral playing field for smaller political parties to compete equally. The normalization theory, however, suggests the opposite – the major party continues to dominate the online space, just as it does offline. The question we ask is this: Does the Internet help the opposition parties in Singapore overcome structural disadvantages offline, or does it replicate the dominance of the ruling party? We assessed five political parties according to how well they use their websites and Facebook during the 2015 general election (GE15). Our study found an overall normalization effect, where the main party emerged as the best user of new media in their campaign, and the opposition parties' use of new media reflected their strengths offline. As most papers have focused on democratic countries, this paper plugs a research gap by bringing to focus social media and elections studies in a semi-authoritarian country.","PeriodicalId":399705,"journal":{"name":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normalization versus Equalization Effects of the Internet for Political Parties: Singapore's General Election 2015 as a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Tarn How Tan, Ying Hui Tng, Andrew Yeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the equalization theory, new media levels the electoral playing field for smaller political parties to compete equally. The normalization theory, however, suggests the opposite – the major party continues to dominate the online space, just as it does offline. The question we ask is this: Does the Internet help the opposition parties in Singapore overcome structural disadvantages offline, or does it replicate the dominance of the ruling party? We assessed five political parties according to how well they use their websites and Facebook during the 2015 general election (GE15). Our study found an overall normalization effect, where the main party emerged as the best user of new media in their campaign, and the opposition parties' use of new media reflected their strengths offline. As most papers have focused on democratic countries, this paper plugs a research gap by bringing to focus social media and elections studies in a semi-authoritarian country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

根据均等化理论,新媒体为小政党提供了公平竞争的选举环境。然而,正常化理论的结论却恰恰相反——主要政党继续主宰着网络空间,就像它在线下所做的那样。我们的问题是:互联网是帮助新加坡反对党克服线下的结构性劣势,还是复制了执政党的主导地位?我们根据五个政党在2015年大选(第15届大选)期间使用网站和Facebook的情况对他们进行了评估。我们的研究发现了一种整体的正常化效应,即主要政党在竞选中成为新媒体的最佳用户,而反对党对新媒体的使用反映了他们在线下的优势。由于大多数论文都关注民主国家,这篇论文通过将社交媒体和选举研究集中在一个半威权国家,填补了研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normalization versus Equalization Effects of the Internet for Political Parties: Singapore's General Election 2015 as a Case Study
According to the equalization theory, new media levels the electoral playing field for smaller political parties to compete equally. The normalization theory, however, suggests the opposite – the major party continues to dominate the online space, just as it does offline. The question we ask is this: Does the Internet help the opposition parties in Singapore overcome structural disadvantages offline, or does it replicate the dominance of the ruling party? We assessed five political parties according to how well they use their websites and Facebook during the 2015 general election (GE15). Our study found an overall normalization effect, where the main party emerged as the best user of new media in their campaign, and the opposition parties' use of new media reflected their strengths offline. As most papers have focused on democratic countries, this paper plugs a research gap by bringing to focus social media and elections studies in a semi-authoritarian country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信