患者的个体特征和眼睛的生物特征参数对点眼压测量和点眼压测量指标差异的影响

D. A. Dorofeev, A. A. Antonov, E. Karlova, E. V. Kirilik, I. V. Kozlova, A. A. Markelova
{"title":"患者的个体特征和眼睛的生物特征参数对点眼压测量和点眼压测量指标差异的影响","authors":"D. A. Dorofeev, A. A. Antonov, E. Karlova, E. V. Kirilik, I. V. Kozlova, A. A. Markelova","doi":"10.25276/0235-4160-2022-4s-29-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The main modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma is intraocular pressure (IOP). For over two hundred years, there has been a search for a method for determining the level of IOP, which took into account the properties of the surface of the cornea and iatrogenic factors. Purpose. To assess the influence of individual characteristics of the eyeball on the difference in ophthalmotonometry, measured by the Maklakov's applanation method and using point contact tonometry (iCare). Material and methods. The work involved 226 patients aged 45 to 89 years (342 eyes) with a diagnosis of primary openangle glaucoma (POAG) (71 eyes) or suspected glaucoma (202 eyes). The study also used data on the observation of healthy eyes (69 eyes). The study is analytical, observational, case-control. The leading diagnoses at the time of the study were: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and suspected glaucoma. Also, data on observation of healthy eyes were used in the work. Clinical refraction varied of ±6.0 diopters and astigmatism ±3.0 diopters. All patients underwent ophthalmic tonometry measurement using the Maklakov applanation method (with a load of 5, 10 and 15 g) and iCare point contact tonometry (Tiolat, Finland). Results. The results of point contact tonometry were relatively underestimated relative to the tonometric indicators by Maklakov's tonometry: 5 g – 4.1±4.0 (4.0 [1.0; 7.0]), 10 g – 9.7±4.0 (10.0 [6.5; 12.5]), 15 g – 14.7±4.2 (15.0 [12.0; 18.0]). Conclusion. The reasons for the difference from the Maklakov's tonometer require further study; they can be associated both with the measurement method, the patient's body position, the characteristics of the group set, and various approaches to the calibration of the tested tonometers. A positive point is the higher numbers of ophthalmotonus in Maklakov's tonometry, since this is the main screening method of ophthalmotonometry on the territory of the Russian Federation. Keywords: intraocular pressure, elastotometry, rebound tonometry, point contact tonometry, ophthalmotonometry, Maklakov's tonometer","PeriodicalId":424200,"journal":{"name":"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the individual characteristics of the patient and the biometric parameters of the eye on the difference between the indicators of point tonometry and tonometry according to Maklakov\",\"authors\":\"D. A. Dorofeev, A. A. Antonov, E. Karlova, E. V. Kirilik, I. V. Kozlova, A. A. Markelova\",\"doi\":\"10.25276/0235-4160-2022-4s-29-39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. The main modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma is intraocular pressure (IOP). For over two hundred years, there has been a search for a method for determining the level of IOP, which took into account the properties of the surface of the cornea and iatrogenic factors. Purpose. To assess the influence of individual characteristics of the eyeball on the difference in ophthalmotonometry, measured by the Maklakov's applanation method and using point contact tonometry (iCare). Material and methods. The work involved 226 patients aged 45 to 89 years (342 eyes) with a diagnosis of primary openangle glaucoma (POAG) (71 eyes) or suspected glaucoma (202 eyes). The study also used data on the observation of healthy eyes (69 eyes). The study is analytical, observational, case-control. The leading diagnoses at the time of the study were: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and suspected glaucoma. Also, data on observation of healthy eyes were used in the work. Clinical refraction varied of ±6.0 diopters and astigmatism ±3.0 diopters. All patients underwent ophthalmic tonometry measurement using the Maklakov applanation method (with a load of 5, 10 and 15 g) and iCare point contact tonometry (Tiolat, Finland). Results. The results of point contact tonometry were relatively underestimated relative to the tonometric indicators by Maklakov's tonometry: 5 g – 4.1±4.0 (4.0 [1.0; 7.0]), 10 g – 9.7±4.0 (10.0 [6.5; 12.5]), 15 g – 14.7±4.2 (15.0 [12.0; 18.0]). Conclusion. The reasons for the difference from the Maklakov's tonometer require further study; they can be associated both with the measurement method, the patient's body position, the characteristics of the group set, and various approaches to the calibration of the tested tonometers. A positive point is the higher numbers of ophthalmotonus in Maklakov's tonometry, since this is the main screening method of ophthalmotonometry on the territory of the Russian Federation. Keywords: intraocular pressure, elastotometry, rebound tonometry, point contact tonometry, ophthalmotonometry, Maklakov's tonometer\",\"PeriodicalId\":424200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2022-4s-29-39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2022-4s-29-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的相关性。青光眼发生和发展的主要可改变的危险因素是眼压。两百多年来,人们一直在寻找一种既考虑角膜表面特性又考虑医源性因素的IOP水平测定方法。目的。目的探讨眼球个体特征对Maklakov压平法和点接触眼压仪(iCare)眼压测量差异的影响。材料和方法。研究涉及226例年龄在45 - 89岁之间的患者(342只眼),诊断为原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)(71只眼)或疑似青光眼(202只眼)。该研究还使用了健康眼睛(69只眼睛)的观察数据。本研究为分析性、观察性、病例对照研究。在研究期间,主要的诊断是:原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和疑似青光眼。工作中还使用了健康眼的观察资料。临床屈光±6.0屈光度,散光±3.0屈光度。所有患者均采用Maklakov眼压法(负荷分别为5、10和15 g)和iCare点接触眼压仪(芬兰Tiolat)进行眼压测量。结果。相对于Maklakov血压计的血压计指标,点接触血压计的结果被相对低估:5 g - 4.1±4.0 (4.0 [1.0;7.0]), 10 g - 9.7±4.0 (10.0 [6.5;12.5]), 15 g - 14.7±4.2 (15.0 [12.0;18.0])。结论。与马克拉科夫眼压计不同的原因有待进一步研究;它们可以与测量方法、患者体位、组组特征以及校准所测眼压计的各种方法相关联。积极的一点是,在Maklakov眼压测量中眼压的数量较多,因为这是俄罗斯联邦领土上眼压测量的主要筛查方法。关键词:眼压,弹性眼压,回弹眼压,点接触眼压,眼动眼压,Maklakov眼压计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of the individual characteristics of the patient and the biometric parameters of the eye on the difference between the indicators of point tonometry and tonometry according to Maklakov
Relevance. The main modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma is intraocular pressure (IOP). For over two hundred years, there has been a search for a method for determining the level of IOP, which took into account the properties of the surface of the cornea and iatrogenic factors. Purpose. To assess the influence of individual characteristics of the eyeball on the difference in ophthalmotonometry, measured by the Maklakov's applanation method and using point contact tonometry (iCare). Material and methods. The work involved 226 patients aged 45 to 89 years (342 eyes) with a diagnosis of primary openangle glaucoma (POAG) (71 eyes) or suspected glaucoma (202 eyes). The study also used data on the observation of healthy eyes (69 eyes). The study is analytical, observational, case-control. The leading diagnoses at the time of the study were: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and suspected glaucoma. Also, data on observation of healthy eyes were used in the work. Clinical refraction varied of ±6.0 diopters and astigmatism ±3.0 diopters. All patients underwent ophthalmic tonometry measurement using the Maklakov applanation method (with a load of 5, 10 and 15 g) and iCare point contact tonometry (Tiolat, Finland). Results. The results of point contact tonometry were relatively underestimated relative to the tonometric indicators by Maklakov's tonometry: 5 g – 4.1±4.0 (4.0 [1.0; 7.0]), 10 g – 9.7±4.0 (10.0 [6.5; 12.5]), 15 g – 14.7±4.2 (15.0 [12.0; 18.0]). Conclusion. The reasons for the difference from the Maklakov's tonometer require further study; they can be associated both with the measurement method, the patient's body position, the characteristics of the group set, and various approaches to the calibration of the tested tonometers. A positive point is the higher numbers of ophthalmotonus in Maklakov's tonometry, since this is the main screening method of ophthalmotonometry on the territory of the Russian Federation. Keywords: intraocular pressure, elastotometry, rebound tonometry, point contact tonometry, ophthalmotonometry, Maklakov's tonometer
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信