耳鼻喉外科和神经外科的预防:一个重要的回顾。

M Shapiro
{"title":"耳鼻喉外科和神经外科的预防:一个重要的回顾。","authors":"M Shapiro","doi":"10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an assessment of prospective, controlled studies of antimicrobial prophylaxis against infections following otolaryngologic surgery and neurosurgery, the English-language literature on this topic was reviewed. Rates of infection following clean otolaryngologic operations are the same for patients receiving prophylaxis and those receiving placebo. For patients with head and neck cancer, rates of postoperative infection without antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery are less than 1%, and prophylaxis is not indicated; in contrast, in clean-contaminated procedures (infection rate, 18%-87%), prophylaxis is highly protective, although several studies have shown no advantage to its prolongation beyond 24 hours. For the latter operations, drugs with adequate activity against oral anaerobes are essential, whereas the need for coverage against Enterobacteriaceae is doubtful. In clean and clean-contaminated neurosurgical procedures, the rate of protective efficacy of prophylaxis ranges between 63% and 76%. For shunt operations the available evidence favors prophylaxis, but the wide range of infections reported mandates a large-scale multicenter trial to decide the issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":21184,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of infectious diseases","volume":"13 Suppl 10 ","pages":"S858-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s858","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylaxis in otolaryngologic surgery and neurosurgery: a critical review.\",\"authors\":\"M Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In an assessment of prospective, controlled studies of antimicrobial prophylaxis against infections following otolaryngologic surgery and neurosurgery, the English-language literature on this topic was reviewed. Rates of infection following clean otolaryngologic operations are the same for patients receiving prophylaxis and those receiving placebo. For patients with head and neck cancer, rates of postoperative infection without antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery are less than 1%, and prophylaxis is not indicated; in contrast, in clean-contaminated procedures (infection rate, 18%-87%), prophylaxis is highly protective, although several studies have shown no advantage to its prolongation beyond 24 hours. For the latter operations, drugs with adequate activity against oral anaerobes are essential, whereas the need for coverage against Enterobacteriaceae is doubtful. In clean and clean-contaminated neurosurgical procedures, the rate of protective efficacy of prophylaxis ranges between 63% and 76%. For shunt operations the available evidence favors prophylaxis, but the wide range of infections reported mandates a large-scale multicenter trial to decide the issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews of infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 10 \",\"pages\":\"S858-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s858\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews of infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

在对耳鼻喉外科手术和神经外科手术后抗菌药物预防感染的前瞻性对照研究的评估中,对这一主题的英语文献进行了回顾。接受预防措施的患者和接受安慰剂的患者在清洁耳鼻喉手术后的感染率是相同的。对于头颈癌患者,清洁手术中无抗生素预防的术后感染率小于1%,不需要预防;相比之下,在清洁污染的手术中(感染率为18%-87%),预防具有高度保护作用,尽管几项研究表明,延长预防时间超过24小时没有任何优势。对于后一种手术,对口服厌氧菌具有足够活性的药物是必不可少的,而对肠杆菌科的覆盖需要是值得怀疑的。在清洁和清洁污染的神经外科手术中,预防的保护效能率在63%至76%之间。对于分流手术,现有的证据倾向于预防,但报告的广泛感染要求进行大规模的多中心试验来决定这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prophylaxis in otolaryngologic surgery and neurosurgery: a critical review.

In an assessment of prospective, controlled studies of antimicrobial prophylaxis against infections following otolaryngologic surgery and neurosurgery, the English-language literature on this topic was reviewed. Rates of infection following clean otolaryngologic operations are the same for patients receiving prophylaxis and those receiving placebo. For patients with head and neck cancer, rates of postoperative infection without antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery are less than 1%, and prophylaxis is not indicated; in contrast, in clean-contaminated procedures (infection rate, 18%-87%), prophylaxis is highly protective, although several studies have shown no advantage to its prolongation beyond 24 hours. For the latter operations, drugs with adequate activity against oral anaerobes are essential, whereas the need for coverage against Enterobacteriaceae is doubtful. In clean and clean-contaminated neurosurgical procedures, the rate of protective efficacy of prophylaxis ranges between 63% and 76%. For shunt operations the available evidence favors prophylaxis, but the wide range of infections reported mandates a large-scale multicenter trial to decide the issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信