Stewart和TBBP的正解:基于LSTM的神经网络方法

Qiming Wang, Muyu Xue, Jian Su, Qiyuan Liu, Boqiang Chen, Ming Fang
{"title":"Stewart和TBBP的正解:基于LSTM的神经网络方法","authors":"Qiming Wang, Muyu Xue, Jian Su, Qiyuan Liu, Boqiang Chen, Ming Fang","doi":"10.1109/RCAE56054.2022.9996010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aiming the problems of the traditional numerical method for solving the pose forward kinematics of parallel mechanism, which relies heavily on the initial value of iteration, has low accuracy and offers poor real-time performance, this article thus proposed a method combining LSTM (Long-Short-Term Memory) prediction model with inverse kinematics solution of parallel mechanism. This method takes the typical Stewart platform (SP) and the test bench for bogie parameters (TBBP) as sample robots. First, the constraint conditions of the two mechanisms were considered in order to obtain the workspace for each; the pose inverse solution Simulink models for both mechanisms were then generated. Second, given the motion posture in the workspace, the telescopic amount of the driving rod can be obtained. Then the data corresponding to the time series of the 6-DOF pose and the telescopic amount was taken as sample training data for LSTM in the next step. Finally, RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) and MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) were applied as optimisation indexes to determine the optimal structural parameter combinations of LSTM networks to analyse the prediction effects for both the SP and TBBP mechanisms under a circular trajectory, a spiral trajectory, and 0∽5 Hz linear sweep vibration trajectory. The results showed that the order of magnitude of RMSE of the prediction models for both mechanisms was 10–4 for both the circular and spiral trajectory, especially the RMSE for TBBP was 10–5 for the spiral trajectory, a MAPE of just 0.0013%. Comparing the above-fixed frequency trajectory, the RMSE and MAPE under the 0∽5Hz linear variable frequency trajectory are 0.0931 and 4.45% respectively; The prediction results for both structures meet the stated accuracy requirements and verify that the proposed LSTM prediction method offers both strong universality and good rationality.","PeriodicalId":165439,"journal":{"name":"2022 5th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE)","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forward Kinematics Solution for Stewart and TBBP: A Neural Network Approach Based on LSTM\",\"authors\":\"Qiming Wang, Muyu Xue, Jian Su, Qiyuan Liu, Boqiang Chen, Ming Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RCAE56054.2022.9996010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aiming the problems of the traditional numerical method for solving the pose forward kinematics of parallel mechanism, which relies heavily on the initial value of iteration, has low accuracy and offers poor real-time performance, this article thus proposed a method combining LSTM (Long-Short-Term Memory) prediction model with inverse kinematics solution of parallel mechanism. This method takes the typical Stewart platform (SP) and the test bench for bogie parameters (TBBP) as sample robots. First, the constraint conditions of the two mechanisms were considered in order to obtain the workspace for each; the pose inverse solution Simulink models for both mechanisms were then generated. Second, given the motion posture in the workspace, the telescopic amount of the driving rod can be obtained. Then the data corresponding to the time series of the 6-DOF pose and the telescopic amount was taken as sample training data for LSTM in the next step. Finally, RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) and MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) were applied as optimisation indexes to determine the optimal structural parameter combinations of LSTM networks to analyse the prediction effects for both the SP and TBBP mechanisms under a circular trajectory, a spiral trajectory, and 0∽5 Hz linear sweep vibration trajectory. The results showed that the order of magnitude of RMSE of the prediction models for both mechanisms was 10–4 for both the circular and spiral trajectory, especially the RMSE for TBBP was 10–5 for the spiral trajectory, a MAPE of just 0.0013%. Comparing the above-fixed frequency trajectory, the RMSE and MAPE under the 0∽5Hz linear variable frequency trajectory are 0.0931 and 4.45% respectively; The prediction results for both structures meet the stated accuracy requirements and verify that the proposed LSTM prediction method offers both strong universality and good rationality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 5th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE)\",\"volume\":\"181 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 5th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCAE56054.2022.9996010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 5th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCAE56054.2022.9996010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

针对传统求解并联机构位姿正解的数值方法严重依赖迭代初值、精度低、实时性差等问题,本文提出了一种将LSTM(长短期记忆)预测模型与并联机构运动学逆解相结合的方法。该方法以典型的Stewart平台(SP)和转向架参数试验台(TBBP)为样本机器人。首先,考虑了两种机构的约束条件,得到了各自的工作空间;建立了两种机构的位姿反解Simulink模型。其次,给定工作空间中的运动姿态,可以得到驱动杆的伸缩量。然后将6自由度位姿和伸缩量的时间序列对应的数据作为下一步LSTM的样本训练数据。最后,以RMSE (Root Mean Square Error)和MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error)为优化指标,确定了LSTM网络的最优结构参数组合,分析了圆形轨迹、螺旋轨迹和0∽5 Hz线性扫描振动轨迹下SP和TBBP机构的预测效果。结果表明:两种机制预测模型的RMSE均为10-4,其中螺旋轨迹预测模型的RMSE为10-5,MAPE仅为0.0013%;0∽5Hz线性变频轨迹下的RMSE和MAPE分别为0.0931和4.45%;两种结构的预测结果均满足精度要求,验证了LSTM预测方法具有较强的通用性和较好的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forward Kinematics Solution for Stewart and TBBP: A Neural Network Approach Based on LSTM
Aiming the problems of the traditional numerical method for solving the pose forward kinematics of parallel mechanism, which relies heavily on the initial value of iteration, has low accuracy and offers poor real-time performance, this article thus proposed a method combining LSTM (Long-Short-Term Memory) prediction model with inverse kinematics solution of parallel mechanism. This method takes the typical Stewart platform (SP) and the test bench for bogie parameters (TBBP) as sample robots. First, the constraint conditions of the two mechanisms were considered in order to obtain the workspace for each; the pose inverse solution Simulink models for both mechanisms were then generated. Second, given the motion posture in the workspace, the telescopic amount of the driving rod can be obtained. Then the data corresponding to the time series of the 6-DOF pose and the telescopic amount was taken as sample training data for LSTM in the next step. Finally, RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) and MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) were applied as optimisation indexes to determine the optimal structural parameter combinations of LSTM networks to analyse the prediction effects for both the SP and TBBP mechanisms under a circular trajectory, a spiral trajectory, and 0∽5 Hz linear sweep vibration trajectory. The results showed that the order of magnitude of RMSE of the prediction models for both mechanisms was 10–4 for both the circular and spiral trajectory, especially the RMSE for TBBP was 10–5 for the spiral trajectory, a MAPE of just 0.0013%. Comparing the above-fixed frequency trajectory, the RMSE and MAPE under the 0∽5Hz linear variable frequency trajectory are 0.0931 and 4.45% respectively; The prediction results for both structures meet the stated accuracy requirements and verify that the proposed LSTM prediction method offers both strong universality and good rationality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信