{"title":"十四行诗和第一人称复数","authors":"R. Lyne","doi":"10.1093/camqtly/bfz018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay considers the pronoun ‘we’ in the love sonnets of Sidney, Spenser, and Shakespeare, in the light of developments in the study of social cognition. Some philosophers and cognitive scientists have developed the idea of an ‘individual we’, a state of the individual mind that is transformed by interaction with others. This idea is parsimonious, in that it does not posit, for example, a group mind, but it also allows for changes in the individual as a result of shared experience. It proves illuminating as a prompt for rethinking pronominal assertions of mutuality (some convincing, some not) in sonnets, and the poems themselves reflect back on what it is to say ‘we’.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.","PeriodicalId":374258,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Quarterly","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sonnets and the First Person Plural\",\"authors\":\"R. Lyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/camqtly/bfz018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay considers the pronoun ‘we’ in the love sonnets of Sidney, Spenser, and Shakespeare, in the light of developments in the study of social cognition. Some philosophers and cognitive scientists have developed the idea of an ‘individual we’, a state of the individual mind that is transformed by interaction with others. This idea is parsimonious, in that it does not posit, for example, a group mind, but it also allows for changes in the individual as a result of shared experience. It proves illuminating as a prompt for rethinking pronominal assertions of mutuality (some convincing, some not) in sonnets, and the poems themselves reflect back on what it is to say ‘we’.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This essay considers the pronoun ‘we’ in the love sonnets of Sidney, Spenser, and Shakespeare, in the light of developments in the study of social cognition. Some philosophers and cognitive scientists have developed the idea of an ‘individual we’, a state of the individual mind that is transformed by interaction with others. This idea is parsimonious, in that it does not posit, for example, a group mind, but it also allows for changes in the individual as a result of shared experience. It proves illuminating as a prompt for rethinking pronominal assertions of mutuality (some convincing, some not) in sonnets, and the poems themselves reflect back on what it is to say ‘we’.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
