{"title":"SPH的负载均衡策略","authors":"K. Puri, P. Ramachandran, Pushkar J. Godbole","doi":"10.1109/PARCOMPTECH.2013.6621394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the performance of different load balancing algorithms when used with the Smooth Particle Hydro-dynamics (SPH) particle method. We compare several geometric algorithms and a serial graph partitioning algorithm (Metis) in terms of the efficiency and quality of partitioning. We find that the geometric partitioners are better suited with the RIB method producing the best partitions for the problems considered.","PeriodicalId":344858,"journal":{"name":"2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PARCOMPTECH)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load balancing strategies for SPH\",\"authors\":\"K. Puri, P. Ramachandran, Pushkar J. Godbole\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PARCOMPTECH.2013.6621394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluate the performance of different load balancing algorithms when used with the Smooth Particle Hydro-dynamics (SPH) particle method. We compare several geometric algorithms and a serial graph partitioning algorithm (Metis) in terms of the efficiency and quality of partitioning. We find that the geometric partitioners are better suited with the RIB method producing the best partitions for the problems considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PARCOMPTECH)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PARCOMPTECH)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARCOMPTECH.2013.6621394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PARCOMPTECH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARCOMPTECH.2013.6621394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We evaluate the performance of different load balancing algorithms when used with the Smooth Particle Hydro-dynamics (SPH) particle method. We compare several geometric algorithms and a serial graph partitioning algorithm (Metis) in terms of the efficiency and quality of partitioning. We find that the geometric partitioners are better suited with the RIB method producing the best partitions for the problems considered.