难以插管预测:身高与甲状腺距离之比、Mallampati评分和甲状腺距离的比较

Riyadh Firdaus, A. Perdana, Rinal Effendi
{"title":"难以插管预测:身高与甲状腺距离之比、Mallampati评分和甲状腺距离的比较","authors":"Riyadh Firdaus, A. Perdana, Rinal Effendi","doi":"10.47830/jinma-vol.73.1-2023-813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Mallampati score and thyromental distance (TMD) are frequently used to identify challenging laryngoscopies, but their reliability in predicting difficulty is uncertain. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of using the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) in predicting difficult visualization of the larynx (DVL) when compared to the Mallampati score and TMD.Method: To achieve this goal, 277 patients who received general anesthesia during elective surgery were evaluated using the Mallampati score, TMD, and RHTMD. The Cormack and Lehane (CL) classification was used to grade the laryngeal view, with CL grade 3 and 4 indicating difficult visualization. The study then determined and compared the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for each airway predictor.Results: The AUC of RHTMD (85.5%) was better than TMD (82.7%) and significantly better than the Mallampati score (61.4%).Conclusion: RHTMD is more accurate in predicting difficult laryngoscopy than both the Mallampati score and TMD.","PeriodicalId":378619,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficult Intubation Predictor: Comparison Between Ratio Of Height To Thyromental Distance, Mallampati Score And Thyromental Distance\",\"authors\":\"Riyadh Firdaus, A. Perdana, Rinal Effendi\",\"doi\":\"10.47830/jinma-vol.73.1-2023-813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The Mallampati score and thyromental distance (TMD) are frequently used to identify challenging laryngoscopies, but their reliability in predicting difficulty is uncertain. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of using the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) in predicting difficult visualization of the larynx (DVL) when compared to the Mallampati score and TMD.Method: To achieve this goal, 277 patients who received general anesthesia during elective surgery were evaluated using the Mallampati score, TMD, and RHTMD. The Cormack and Lehane (CL) classification was used to grade the laryngeal view, with CL grade 3 and 4 indicating difficult visualization. The study then determined and compared the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for each airway predictor.Results: The AUC of RHTMD (85.5%) was better than TMD (82.7%) and significantly better than the Mallampati score (61.4%).Conclusion: RHTMD is more accurate in predicting difficult laryngoscopy than both the Mallampati score and TMD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47830/jinma-vol.73.1-2023-813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47830/jinma-vol.73.1-2023-813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:Mallampati评分和甲状腺距离(TMD)常被用于识别困难的喉镜检查,但其预测困难的可靠性尚不确定。本研究旨在评估与Mallampati评分和TMD相比,使用身高与甲状腺距离之比(RHTMD)预测喉部难以可视化(DVL)的有效性。方法:采用Mallampati评分、TMD和RHTMD对277例择期手术全麻患者进行评价。采用Cormack和Lehane (CL)分级对喉部视像进行分级,CL分级为3级和4级,表示难以观察。然后,研究确定并比较了每种气道预测因子的曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性。结果:RHTMD的AUC(85.5%)优于TMD(82.7%),显著优于Mallampati评分(61.4%)。结论:RHTMD比Mallampati评分和TMD更准确地预测喉镜检查困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difficult Intubation Predictor: Comparison Between Ratio Of Height To Thyromental Distance, Mallampati Score And Thyromental Distance
Introduction: The Mallampati score and thyromental distance (TMD) are frequently used to identify challenging laryngoscopies, but their reliability in predicting difficulty is uncertain. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of using the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) in predicting difficult visualization of the larynx (DVL) when compared to the Mallampati score and TMD.Method: To achieve this goal, 277 patients who received general anesthesia during elective surgery were evaluated using the Mallampati score, TMD, and RHTMD. The Cormack and Lehane (CL) classification was used to grade the laryngeal view, with CL grade 3 and 4 indicating difficult visualization. The study then determined and compared the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for each airway predictor.Results: The AUC of RHTMD (85.5%) was better than TMD (82.7%) and significantly better than the Mallampati score (61.4%).Conclusion: RHTMD is more accurate in predicting difficult laryngoscopy than both the Mallampati score and TMD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信