YOLOv5和YOLOv7目标检测算法的比较研究

Oluwaseyi Olorunshola, Martins E. Irhebhude, A. Evwiekpaefe
{"title":"YOLOv5和YOLOv7目标检测算法的比较研究","authors":"Oluwaseyi Olorunshola, Martins E. Irhebhude, A. Evwiekpaefe","doi":"10.33736/jcsi.5070.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis of the widely accepted YOLOv5 and the latest version of YOLO which is YOLOv7. Experiments were carried out by training a custom model with both YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 independently in order to consider which one of the two performs better in terms of precision, recall, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95. The dataset used in the experiment is a custom dataset for Remote Weapon Station which consists of 9,779 images containing 21,561 annotations of four classes gotten from Google Open Images Dataset, Roboflow Public Dataset and locally sourced dataset. The four classes are Persons, Handguns, Rifles and Knives. The experimental results of YOLOv7 were precision score of 52.8%, recall value of 56.4%, mAP@0.5 of 51.5% and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 31.5% while that of YOLOv5 were precision score of 62.6%, recall value of 53.4%, mAP@0.5 of 55.3% and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 34.2%. It was observed from the experiment conducted that YOLOv5 gave a better result than YOLOv7 in terms of precision, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 overall while YOLOv7 has a higher recall value during testing than YOLOv5. YOLOv5 records 4.0% increase in accuracy compared to YOLOv7.","PeriodicalId":177345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing and Social Informatics","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 Object Detection Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Oluwaseyi Olorunshola, Martins E. Irhebhude, A. Evwiekpaefe\",\"doi\":\"10.33736/jcsi.5070.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative analysis of the widely accepted YOLOv5 and the latest version of YOLO which is YOLOv7. Experiments were carried out by training a custom model with both YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 independently in order to consider which one of the two performs better in terms of precision, recall, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95. The dataset used in the experiment is a custom dataset for Remote Weapon Station which consists of 9,779 images containing 21,561 annotations of four classes gotten from Google Open Images Dataset, Roboflow Public Dataset and locally sourced dataset. The four classes are Persons, Handguns, Rifles and Knives. The experimental results of YOLOv7 were precision score of 52.8%, recall value of 56.4%, mAP@0.5 of 51.5% and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 31.5% while that of YOLOv5 were precision score of 62.6%, recall value of 53.4%, mAP@0.5 of 55.3% and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 34.2%. It was observed from the experiment conducted that YOLOv5 gave a better result than YOLOv7 in terms of precision, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 overall while YOLOv7 has a higher recall value during testing than YOLOv5. YOLOv5 records 4.0% increase in accuracy compared to YOLOv7.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computing and Social Informatics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computing and Social Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcsi.5070.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing and Social Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcsi.5070.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文对目前被广泛接受的YOLOv5和最新版本的YOLOv7进行了比较分析。实验采用YOLOv5和YOLOv7分别独立训练自定义模型,考虑哪一种模型在准确率、召回率(mAP@0.5和mAP@0.5:0.95)方面表现更好。实验中使用的数据集是远程武器站的自定义数据集,该数据集由来自谷歌开放图像数据集、Roboflow公共数据集和本地数据源数据集的9,779张图像组成,其中包含四类21,561条注释。这四种武器分别是人、手枪、步枪和刀具。YOLOv7的准确率为52.8%,召回率为56.4%,mAP@0.5为51.5%,mAP@0.5:0.95 (31.5%); YOLOv5的准确率为62.6%,召回率为53.4%,mAP@0.5为55.3%,mAP@0.5:0.95(34.2%)。从实验中可以看出,YOLOv5在准确率方面优于YOLOv7, mAP@0.5和mAP@0.5:总体为0.95,而YOLOv7在测试过程中具有高于YOLOv5的召回值。与YOLOv7相比,YOLOv5记录的准确率提高了4.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 Object Detection Algorithms
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the widely accepted YOLOv5 and the latest version of YOLO which is YOLOv7. Experiments were carried out by training a custom model with both YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 independently in order to consider which one of the two performs better in terms of precision, recall, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95. The dataset used in the experiment is a custom dataset for Remote Weapon Station which consists of 9,779 images containing 21,561 annotations of four classes gotten from Google Open Images Dataset, Roboflow Public Dataset and locally sourced dataset. The four classes are Persons, Handguns, Rifles and Knives. The experimental results of YOLOv7 were precision score of 52.8%, recall value of 56.4%, mAP@0.5 of 51.5% and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 31.5% while that of YOLOv5 were precision score of 62.6%, recall value of 53.4%, mAP@0.5 of 55.3% and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 34.2%. It was observed from the experiment conducted that YOLOv5 gave a better result than YOLOv7 in terms of precision, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 overall while YOLOv7 has a higher recall value during testing than YOLOv5. YOLOv5 records 4.0% increase in accuracy compared to YOLOv7.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信